Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: crazylibertarian

Jesus was a wealthy man who wore the most expensive garments and ate with wealthy benefactors. For him, wealth was not a measure of sin nor was poverty an essential ingredient of sanctity. The politics of economics are unsuitable as a measure of Christianity.


6 posted on 04/05/2014 1:50:33 PM PDT by Louis Foxwell (This is a wake up call. Join the Sultan Knish ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Louis Foxwell

No, Jesus was not part of the upper class when living as a man; otherwise he would have stood out starkly (Matthew 11:8 and Luke 7:25 refer specifically to John the Baptist, but given Jesus’ ability to blend in with ordinary Jews, He wasn’t a wearer of the most expensive garments either nor did he “live delicately”). Never mind Nazareth not having a good reputation during Jesus’ time (remember John 1:46?)


8 posted on 04/05/2014 1:54:49 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Louis Foxwell

Oh...so Jesus—a literal heir to the throne of Kind David—would have been like Joel Olsteen or Billy Graham? A counselor to the rich and famous?

People forget that he was not a “simple” man. He was a direct descendant of the bloodline of David. Not a simple blood line at all.

People read the bible but have no understanding of what the words mean.


34 posted on 04/05/2014 2:40:17 PM PDT by Vermont Lt (If you want to keep your dignity, you can keep it. Period........ Just kidding, you can't keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson