good grief man - you are the one who underlined your.
Think about that - of course it was my wife who the heck would I be talking about.
and I said it in jest!
and all through Acts it is said time and again having met on the lords day we confessed our sins aid the blessing and ate the bread...
it is never found the exact quote we ‘confessed our sins to God’ it always says to one another or each other.
However, without the thorough Examination of Conscience and the an Act of Contrition and without that desire to avoid the sin it doesn’t count - it’s a whiff.
I think you analysis is a lot closer to traditional thought than many of your brethren.
btw the sacramental act of any person, priest or holy one is separated from any transgressions they may have made.... otherwise how could Peter’s evangelization have been efficacious after he essentially spit in Christ’s eye by directly denying Him - if the sin is not separated from the sinner after forgiveness, as common sense is still confirmed in faith.
AMDG
What does TRADITIONAL mean in this sentence?
Think about that - of course it was my wife who the heck would I be talking about.
There was a reason I did so. I don't need be told to "think about it", for I know why I did so.
It is you who seem to not understand me at all -- while not much addressing what it is I have said, other than to come at me from Romish teachings -- which I know well enough already, and need no teacher of per se --or seek either.
But rather --- why include mention of "slights" made against your own wife and daughter, in a prayer -- unless possible you held ought against another, or more simply wanted to remind everyone how put upon you were? Think about that, then you tell me, if you like...
I still don't know who did what you say they did, or where, but I was assuming it occurred in the course of communication on this forum. Perhaps that was an incorrect assumption on my part.
Apparently, citing legalisms of Rome, you said;
then near closing, after indications that forgiveness of sins not rely upon there being no personal transgressions of a 'font of forgiveness' RC priests are by RC theology made out to singularly upon earth be, say;
there at the end come closer to so-called "Protestant" typical understandings, but with understanding being that the keys, the binding and loosening as seen in Matthew chapter sixteen spoken of be given to Peter, and in chapter 18, being given over to all the Apostles directly Christ also, not restricted to being funneled first through Peter to all the rest --- or said much of anywhere to be restricted to those bowing obeisance to some future bishopric located in Rome, into perpetuity.