Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: dsc; Religion Moderator
What I do or don’t know is irrelevant. I’m not going to bestir one finger chasing after lies.

Then since you have already denied this as fulfilling your ambiguous criteria then it means you do not want the evidence.

You never demonstrated Catholic bigotry, and you can’t.

Of course not to you, when you refuse to provide any examples of what you see as bigotry, and instead act like a liberal who uses the race card. And will not let a jury of your peers to judge, I am going to ask you again, provide some examples of what you call bigotry.

“Or are you saying that i am lying about that? Yes or no.”

You don’t get to interrogate me.

Or yes i do have a right to an answer when you infer i am lying. Saying "No examples were given. That is a fabrication" infers just that, unless you mean nothing was sent to you that meets your criteria, as you denied in your PM back to me, "From dsc | 10/16/2013 8:56:41 AM PDT replied" to me PM to you on 10/12/2013 5:13:00 PM PDT sent

“Do you know how to click on links and see that what i just referenced is true and the date?”

What I do or don’t know is irrelevant.

Irrelevant?! Rather you are making yourself irrelevant, making an accusation than simply denying what was sent you, as well as any examples of what you consider bigotry.

If you have anything to show, produce it.

Why? This is like trying to show a car thief a map to the police station.

However, check your PM again for what i sent your before, and a few more, but this time i am also going to copy in the RM, and let him/her judge. And who can also likely affirm i sent you the FRemail dates above.

If you want to post them publicly and find who sent each one and ping them (as you are to do for public posts) and bother them with your insolence, then you can do so.

163 posted on 03/29/2014 8:30:18 PM PDT by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]


To: dsc; daniel1212
One of the guidelines on the Religion Forum is to not carry disputes over from thread to thread. Answering your challenge on thread would require linking to other threads and therefore breaking that guideline.

However, the challenge was answered privately - demonstrated - in Freepmail, as it should be, with links and copied to me.

For the record, on many threads over the years both sides argue against the beliefs of the other. And the accusations are often contentious and hurtful.

And that is to be expected on "open" Religion Forum threads.

Posters who are not comfortable with that type of debate should ignore "open" RF threads altogether and instead read and post to RF threads labeled "prayer" "devotional" "caucus" or "ecumenical."

Enough has been made of this issue on this thread. Time to drop it.

164 posted on 03/29/2014 8:53:43 PM PDT by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson