I’m afraid your fourth choice of non action is the same as either the first choice: not reading the book with continuing non belief in God. You would have essentially convinced yourself that the work is bogus and erroneous despite its apparent conversion of many people to a theistic world view. Would you not even read the work? If only to prove it wrong?
Why buy into laughable bullshit? It only grants credence where none is deserved.
Look, anybody can construct a false sophist choice that ignores all laws of logic and reason, uses equivocation (which this laughable conundrum does); so what?
It proves nothing - except that you might be able to snare the weak minded in your bullshit.
Look, you are entitled to your belief structure. I have no wish to try to engage you in a mind-changing discussion, why would I? Your beliefs are irrelevant to me. And you are welcome to them, go in peace.
I wonder why you feel compelled to try to snare others into yours. Are you insecure?
It is this only that gave me the impetus to post.