Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Boogieman

There was no universal canon in the early church.

The only scriptures at that point in time that were widely used that they would have been familiar with is the Septuagint. And all these books were included in the Septuagint.

“therefore attributing some peculiarly Protestant motive for their exclusion isn’t accurate.”

Then why doesn’t Eastern Orthodoxy exclude them? The motivation for their removal was a protestant novelty.


20 posted on 04/03/2013 5:45:58 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: JCBreckenridge

“There was no universal canon in the early church.”

I didn’t say universally church-accepted canon, I said universally accepted Hebrew canon, meaning the books which all Jews recognized as inspired Scripture.

“Then why doesn’t Eastern Orthodoxy exclude them? The motivation for their removal was a protestant novelty.”

You could say the decision to exclude them was a Protestant one, but the motivation certainly wasn’t, since the books were clearly in question for many centuries before Luther lived. Jerome tried to exclude them, was he a Protestant?


24 posted on 04/03/2013 6:03:57 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson