[Joe 6-pack]

"There is a sort of logical error in using Bible scripture to argue sola scriptura is not Biblical."

Not as glaring as the logical error in assuming the Bible excludes tradition, when it is tradition that dictates which books are included in the Bible. Where in Scripture does it list those books are to be included and which are to be considered apocryphal?

[muawiyah]

You must have not gotten the memo.

[smvoice]

"Where in Scripture does is list those books are to be included and which are to be considered apocryphal?"

The last Old Testament prophet predicted that the messenger coming to Israel from God would be the forerunner of Christ (Malachi 3:1). Most of the Apocryphal books were written during the period between Malachi and Christ. That SHOULD be proof enough that the apocrypha is NOT part of the canon of Scripture.