Thank you for being a Religion Moderator.
Why was swampfox allowed to say, “It’s >You, the Catholic Church and the pope that >”dispise” Christ & His word?”
Yet, I was warned for saying, “you don’t understand it.”
There seems to be >a great difference in the two comments.
Your answer does not explain it.
As to choosing sides:
Please see swampfox comments #147 & 148.
Religion Moderator, >I believe you choose sides when Roman Catholics are defending their Church.
Please review: comment #130 again.
In fact, I would ask you to go back and re-read all of swampfox’s comments. I see them as >personal attacks.
Do you the Religion Moderator see swampfox’s comments as expressing the love for Jesus Christ?
Religion Moderator, if you have read all of swampfox’s comments = you’d realize ALL my comments are about his ‘armchair church.’ Swampfox is presenting himself as the >only member of his church. Swampfox is presenting himself as ‘the pope of his armchair church.’
I keep asking ‘the pope of swampfox’s armchair church’ to explain his religious beliefs & his faith formation. I’m very curious how swampfox became ‘pope of his armchair church.’ I consider it to be a legitimate question.
I also, think people that claim ‘Christianity’ as their religion should NOT NOT be deceitful as to their >religious beliefs & their faith formation.
Religion Moderator: Why can swampfox >attack the Pope of the Catholic Church but we are >admonished for asking questions of the ‘pope of swampfox armchair church?’
Also, just looking at comments #147 & #148, it appears as the though the ‘pope of swampfox’s armchair church,’ thinks you have sided with him.
Swampfox101, on post 130 you were reading gghd's mind and therefore "making it personal" when you said: