Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: MarkBsnr; CynicalBear
Non Catholics normally use the Bible wrong. The difference is that private interpretation is Scripturally forbidden.

Not so. PROPHESY! There is a difference,

391 posted on 05/08/2012 2:33:06 PM PDT by OLD REGGIE (I am a Biblical Unitarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies ]


To: OLD REGGIE

The frequent command to the early Christians, especially from Paul - repeatedly - is that they are required to believe what they are taught - both by the printed word and by the spoken word - by the Church.

The Pharisees received the reprimand from Jesus that they searched the Scriptures, yet did not understand them.

Paul spoke of the Bereans who used Scripture to see whether Paul’s words were true. But the emphasis is on the teachings of the Apostles and their designates - the Church. Nowhere does it say that it is sufficient to read Scripture to be a Christian believer.

It is profitable, to be sure. Yet the example of the Ethiopian eunuch shows us once again that the Church is the “pillar and foundation of truth”. Otherwise we have Luther’s every milkmaid creating new doctrines overnight at whim.


394 posted on 05/09/2012 6:12:22 PM PDT by MarkBsnr (I would not believe in the Gospel, if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 391 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson