Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

+ the BEGGAR KING: Answer to an Anti-Catholic + Part I
Beggar King ^ | Oct 28, 1999 | Larry Nolte

Posted on 04/16/2012 4:33:07 AM PDT by GonzoII

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: Hegewisch Dupa
"but would their be elation from hearing The Father, yet alone His Father, providing such a affirmation?"

There may have on the human level I don't know, but it surely wasn't news to Him he was always with the Father in heaven even when he was on earth.

Joh 3:13 And no man hath ascended into heaven, but he that descended from heaven, the Son of man who is in heaven.

41 posted on 04/16/2012 7:37:05 AM PDT by GonzoII (Quia tu es, Deus, fortitudo mea...Quare tristis es anima mea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Hegewisch Dupa

I think you meant “there be” - Illiterate Boy....


42 posted on 04/16/2012 7:37:08 AM PDT by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Yes, the Lord Jesus taught these to be the first and great commandments.

In John 4:22-24 Jesus said:

“Ye worship what ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews. But the hour cometh, and now is, when true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship Him. God is a Spirit and they that worship Him must worship Him in spirit and in truth.”


43 posted on 04/16/2012 7:42:12 AM PDT by LetMarch (If a man knows the right way to live, and does not live it, there is no greater coward. (Anonymous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

It was the human level I was most asking about - I know all we can do is speculate. But speculation is some of this forum that is fun, when not Klannishly trashing other religions... But I was thinking it gives us a thrill when a loved one affirms that love: perhaps it worked that way for Him too. Like I say, I dunno.


44 posted on 04/16/2012 7:45:29 AM PDT by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII
I think I won’t convince you of a lot of things. It’s the responsibility of the Holy Spirit to do the convincing.

>> apposing feelings or aversions toward the will of God<<

No one ever said there won’t be opposing emotions or “feelings”. We still live in this carnal body.

Romans 7:17 Now then it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.

18 For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not.

19 For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do.

20 Now if I do that I would not, it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.

21 I find then a law, that, when I would do good, evil is present with me.

22 For I delight in the law of God after the inward man:

23 But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members.

24 O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death?

25 I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin.

45 posted on 04/16/2012 7:52:45 AM PDT by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII; JPII Be Not Afraid
Nice try... let me be more specific: I want to know how these core doctrines (called out earlier) can be justified by oral traditions that (a) apparently didn't exist prior to Christ; and (b) overtly contradict the plain meaning of scripture. Traditions must be based on a foundation, and that foundation must be the scriptures in the absence of the voices of the Apostles or Christ Himself. But in the case of these Catholic doctrines, scripture is actually contradicted. How does one explain this away? (Don't bother - I'm seen the arguments, which boil down to 'the scripture doesn't mean what it says.')

Yes, of course the Gospel of Jesus Christ is preached. But it's preached from the scriptures. Why is this such a hard concept?? As as we learned from Paul, it is a good thing to check your preacher once he's done:

"The people in Berea were much nicer than those in Thessalonica, and they gladly accepted the message. Day after day they studied the Scriptures to see if these things [that Paul preached to them during the day] were true." (Acts 17:11)

What is it that they checked? Cassette tapes of oral traditions? Nope. The Written Word of God.

One more thing:

"Mark 13:31 - heaven and earth will pass away, but Jesus' Word will not pass away. But Jesus never says anything about His Word being entirely committed to a book. Also, it took 400 years to compile the Bible, and another 1,000 years to invent the printing press. How was the Word of God communicated? Orally, by the bishops of the Church, with the guidance and protection of the Holy Spirit."

Utter BALDERDASH. The scriptures have been written throughout the ages. Moses wrote it down. God Himself wrote the ten commandments. The scriptures were read before Kings. Jesus almost got stoned after reading the scriptures in his own home town. Christ cited scripture repeatedly. Jesus got into arguments with the SCRIBES and the Pharisees... but it wasn't an argument about their work (as those who wrote down and maintained the scriptures), it was over their own Oral Traditions. In fact, I personally refer to that incident as the First Reformation.

The WRITTEN Word of God has been with us through the history of man on earth, and to pretend otherwise suggests that was made up from nothing.

Hmmmm.... you know, it would have made sense to add in all of these extra-Biblical doctrines at the time that the printing press became possible... except,... oh that's right: the Protestants were the ones who spread the Bible to the masses and showed everyone that the RCC had been making it all up all along.

46 posted on 04/16/2012 7:54:44 AM PDT by alancarp (Liberals are all for shared pain... until they're included in the pain group.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: LetMarch
“But these are written"

Amen! No argument there.

But lets add:

2Th 2:15 Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle.

1Th 2:13 "For this cause also thank we God without ceasing, because, when ye received the word of God which ye heard of us, ye received it not as the word of men, but as it is in truth, the word of God, which effectually worketh also in you that believe."

How can a man's word be the Word of God unless it is of God i.e. God's Word?

47 posted on 04/16/2012 7:55:36 AM PDT by GonzoII (Quia tu es, Deus, fortitudo mea...Quare tristis es anima mea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: alancarp
"Yes, of course the Gospel of Jesus Christ is preached. But it's preached from the scriptures. Why is this such a hard concept??"

Because the Gospels didn't exist when the Apostles went out to preach, how could it?

48 posted on 04/16/2012 8:00:27 AM PDT by GonzoII (Quia tu es, Deus, fortitudo mea...Quare tristis es anima mea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
He was proud of His Son for obeying Him.

????

And Jesus being Baptized forth-with came out of the water:and lo the Heavens were opened to him:and he saw Spirit of God descending as a dove and coming upon Him.

And behold a voice from Heaven saying: "This is My beloved Son.In whom I am pleased".

This is from my Douay-Rheims Bible. The first bible translated. in english from Latin and Greek.

Where does "obeying" come from?

49 posted on 04/16/2012 8:03:30 AM PDT by painter (Rebuild The America We love!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: painter
????

So, you're saying Christ wasn't obeying God? Do you want to go down that path?

50 posted on 04/16/2012 8:05:28 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII
I note that the author does not present his opponents as "Fundamentalist Protestants" but simply as "Fundamentalists." This implies one of two things:

1)Catholicism is a liberal religion in which "truth" is ever changing, ever evolving, and symbolic rather than factual; or

2)"Fundamentalists" are an ethnic group of inbred swamp-dwelling "rednecks" whom the Catholic Church wouldn't have as members even if they begged to join.

Either way, the exclusion of "Fundamentalism" by Catholicism is a very bad thing.

51 posted on 04/16/2012 8:06:47 AM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (Ki-hagoy vehamamlakhah 'asher lo'-ya`avdukh yove'du; vehagoyim charov yecheravu!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII
*Sigh* What we today call the Old Testament certainly did exist. That contained all of the prophecies of Christ, the foretelling of the Word coming to the Gentiles, and it is what Christ and the Apostles preached from. Quotes from the O.T. are commonplace in Matt/Mark/Luke/John/Acts.

The 'Gospel' is the good news that Christ has come, that there is forgiveness from sin through repentance, and that Christ made this possible via his substitutionary sacrifice - paying the penalty for my sin. The preaching of the time was that the Kingdom of God was here and all of the scriptures of that time were being fulfilled right in front of them.

52 posted on 04/16/2012 8:11:55 AM PDT by alancarp (Liberals are all for shared pain... until they're included in the pain group.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator
"1)Catholicism is a liberal religion in which "truth" is ever changing, ever evolving, and symbolic rather than factual; "

What truths?

Birth control? The evil of Homosexual acts? That marriage is between a man and a woman? Abortion is murder? No woman priests? The Catholic Church was established by Christ? Which religions have caved on these issues? Not the Catholic Church.

53 posted on 04/16/2012 8:15:15 AM PDT by GonzoII (Quia tu es, Deus, fortitudo mea...Quare tristis es anima mea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
No. Christ is God.

God sent a part of Himself to Earth to save us from eternal damnation.

54 posted on 04/16/2012 8:18:06 AM PDT by painter (Rebuild The America We love!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator

I believe that the Catholic use of ‘Fundamentalists’ attempts to broad-brush paint anyone (like me) who sticks to scriptures at the expense of dissing their oral traditions. I don’t believe it hits the Fundamentalist faiths specifically... but it would certainly include them by implication.


55 posted on 04/16/2012 8:22:14 AM PDT by alancarp (Liberals are all for shared pain... until they're included in the pain group.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: alancarp
"*Sigh* What we today call the Old Testament certainly did exist. That contained all of the prophecies of Christ, the foretelling of the Word coming to the Gentiles, and it is what Christ and the Apostles preached from. "

You must be kidding if you think the Apostles only preached out of the Old Testament. You make the teachings of Christ void by your argument because they were not yet put to writing.

So they can just forget the words of Christ himself:

Mat 28:20 Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you. And behold I am with you all days, even to the consummation of the world.

So now the Gospel is the Old Testament?

56 posted on 04/16/2012 8:22:14 AM PDT by GonzoII (Quia tu es, Deus, fortitudo mea...Quare tristis es anima mea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: painter
True, and Agreed. However, the conversation started with claims that baptism is not an emotional event, and shouldn't be one. I am disputing that. We are both Christians here, and this is a doctrinal dispute.

However, I believe that it is an important doctrine to get straight due to several Scriptural references.

57 posted on 04/16/2012 8:23:18 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: alancarp
So, what did the first apostles teach from? There was no New Testament Bible when Jesus died. They taught what they had learned from Christ, Christ's Traditions. The Bible as we know it today wasn't formalized until 400 AD. What did they use?

Where in the Bible does it say "scripture only?"

Do you believe in the Trinity? It doesn't say Trinity any where in the bible, so how can you believe in the Father, Son and Holy Spirit?

Martin Luther wanted everyone to interpretate scripture for themselves. How does 25,000 different Christian denominations rationalize Christian unity?

There can only be one truth, which one is right? Let me guess, yours.

You can believe what ever you want, but make no mistake, the Catholic Church is the trunk and all other Christian denominations are branches. I'll stay with the trunk.
58 posted on 04/16/2012 8:30:17 AM PDT by JPII Be Not Afraid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII
You react as if the Bible is incompatible with itself. Yes, of course they used the Old Testament. See Acts 2, Peter's Pentacost sermon where he quotes Joel and the Psalms. As I already indicated, Christ cited OT Scripture as well as a means of proving that he was God's messenger, and indeed God's Christ (c.f. Luke 7:22 where Jesus cited OT prophecy to John's disciples as proof He was the Messiah)

But especially see the post-resurrection Jesus talking with the men on the road to Emmaus: Luke 24:13ff

"27 And beginning with Moses and all the Prophets, he interpreted to them in all the Scriptures the things concerning himself. ... 44 Then he said to them, “These are my words that I spoke to you while I was still with you, that everything written about me in the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms must be fulfilled.” 45 Then he opened their minds to understand the Scriptures..."

The Scriptures are given by God to men who wrote down the words given them by the Holy Spirit throughout our history. It all hangs together. It's all pointing to Christ. It's all about Him. And clearly (seeing Jesus' own actions above), it was necessary to be written, for why would Jesus ever reference it otherwise? He could have simply done a couple of miracles and been done with it.

So yes, the Gospel is the Old Testament, the New testament.... it is the scriptures, it is the Word of God. All. Together.

59 posted on 04/16/2012 8:39:00 AM PDT by alancarp (Liberals are all for shared pain... until they're included in the pain group.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: alancarp
"So yes, the Gospel is the Old Testament, the New testament.... it is the scriptures, it is the Word of God. All. Together."

How could the Apostles preach the words of Christ if they had to be written first before they can be God's Word. Like I said you make Christ's teaching void because they were not first written.

60 posted on 04/16/2012 8:55:02 AM PDT by GonzoII (Quia tu es, Deus, fortitudo mea...Quare tristis es anima mea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson