To: exDemMom; BrandtMichaels; Alamo-Girl; metmom; spirited irish; GourmetDan
... there is enough evidence in the fossil record to piece together how evolution has proceeded throughout the last few billions of year. Please note: There is a dearth of evidence to support the theory of a common ancestor. Yet Darwinists continue to promote the idea of a common ancestor: They want there to be a common ancestor; for it obviates the need for a creator God.
There was nothing "gradual" about the Cambrian explosion. And predecessor transitional life forms are simply absent from the fossil record.
Macroevolution is perhaps the greatest Myth of our age....
475 posted on
03/08/2012 11:10:00 AM PST by
betty boop
(We are led to believe a lie when we see with, and not through the eye. — William Blake)
To: betty boop
"There was nothing "gradual" about the Cambrian explosion. And predecessor transitional life forms are simply absent from the fossil record." Which is why Stephen J. Gould came up with his theory of 'punctuated equilibrium', not only for the Cambrian 'explosion' but for all of macro-evolution.
You remember punk-eek, right? The theory that 'predicted' that the evidence wouldn't exist to explain why the evidence doesn't exist?
Prolly satisfies the 'empirical' definition that some scientists like to use...
477 posted on
03/08/2012 1:08:38 PM PST by
GourmetDan
(Eccl 10:2 - The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.)
To: betty boop
Indeed. Thank you so much for sharing your insights, dearest sister in Christ!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson