Posted on 02/04/2012 6:53:17 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Very, very good e-mail lists — and an internal debate over whether to use them. “I'm getting really tired of the ads for Romney campaign trips coming from this list serve,” writes one young Mormon.
LAS VEGAS, Nevada -- At Mitt Romney’s first rally here earlier this week, there were plenty of hints that the enthusiastic crowd of 1,000 was stacked with Mormons. Kids walked around in BYU sweatshirts, moms chatted about LDS youth groups, and at least one supporter was overheard talking about making phone calls for the candidate as part of "family home evening" -- a weekly family night the church encourages its members to hold.
But while it's no secret that Romney's coreligionists have swelled the ranks at campaign stops from Des Moines to Reno, one question about the Mormon vote has gone largely unanswered this primary season: How, exactly, have they gotten so organized?
"We heard about it from some friends in our [LDS] ward," said one woman standing outside a rally held in a Las Vegas hotel supply warehouse. "We're so glad we could make it." Another Mormon standing nearby chimed in, "Everyone we know is voting for Mitt!"
The secret to the grassroots success lies, in part, in the unique national structure and scrupulous record-keeping of the Utah-headquartered Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. While the church itself is politically neutral, it contains the structural groundwork for one of the most organized and effective voting blocs in the country—something Romney is poised to capitalize on.
Here’s how it works
In contrast with most other religions in the country, the Mormon Church is nationally organized in a strict, top-down fashion, like a corporation. Every congregation in the U.S. reports back to church headquarters in Salt Lake. Whenever an individual is baptized -- either as a child or as a convert -- local ministers take down the person’s name, address, phone number, and e-mail address, and feed the information into a national database maintained by officials in Salt Lake (and only accessible to certain church leaders).
From there, the individuals are assigned to geographically-determined congregations -- or “wards” -- of about 200-300, which they attend on Sundays. Their contact information is filtered into a local “ward list,” which is distributed to all local congregants for planning purposes--from coordinating Sunday school, to working out the logistics for church barbeques.
For decades, these ward lists were printed out and distributed after Sunday services, but in recent years the system has migrated online to LDS.org, where Mormons create logins to access the contact information for every fellow believer in the area.
For active Mormons, wards often become the center of their social universe: it’s not uncommon for members to visit their local chapels three or four times a week for various activities and meetings. Additionally, Mormons participate in “home and visiting teaching” programs, which require them to visit certain ward members on a monthly basis. In this context, ward lists become invaluable tools for Mormons’ daily life—inevitably finding their way into Google groups, listservs, and cell phones.
They also frequently become political tools.
Working the wards
The church expressly forbids using these directories for non-religious purposes, but that doesn’t deter many politically active Mormons from working their ward lists to get out the vote. Reports abound of members blasting out congregational e-mails soliciting support for partisan causes and candidates. One Southern California ward received several e-mails urging congregants to vote for an LDS politician running for local office. And in nastier example of the practice, ward lists in Alpine, Utah were used to spread an anonymous smear campaign against a candidate on the eve of a local election.
Several Mormons told BuzzFeed that as the 2012 primaries heated up, they started to see their fellow congregants use ward lists to organize local efforts for Romney.
Here in Nevada, Ryan Erwin, a consultant for the Romney campaign, acknowledged that the candidate has benefitted from grassroots efforts by Latter-day Saints, and said the campaign is proud of their support. But he also thinks the Mormon factor has been overstated.
“Mormons make up seven percent of the population here,” Erwin said. “If you read some of the reports in the media, you’d think it was 90 percent… it’s a little aggravating when you’ve worked for months to build up an organization and then they say, ‘Well, he just won it because he’s a Mormon.’”
That said, exit polls in 2008 showed that about 25 percent of Nevada caucus-goers self-identified as Mormon -- and Romney won that primary handily. This time around, polling indicates that he’s headed for a similarly dominant victory, and if it happens, local Latter-day Saints will no doubt deserve a chunk of the credit.
Much like how Iowa’s Christian home-school vote advanced its own grassroots efforts for Mike Huckabee largely independently of his campaign, there’s no evidence that Team Romney is officially coordinating with Mormon congregations. But anecdotal evidence suggests that a highly motivated base of Mormon supporters has effectively taken advantage of the LDS infrastructure to help Romney.
The Colonial First Ward listserv
One of the most illustrative examples is the Colonial First Ward listserv, which consists of more than 3,500 D.C.-area Mormons, many of them young and single.
E-mails obtained by BuzzFeed show the listserv being used frequently as a recruiting tool for Romney supporters -- gathering signatures to get the candidate on the Delaware ballot, requesting volunteers to aid the campaign’s Illinois operation, and organizing a get-out-the-vote trip to South Carolina on the weekend of the primary.
The fruits of that last effort were obvious on the ground in Columbia, S.C., where dozens of young Mormon students from Virginia and D.C. were found rallying for Romney at various campaign stops.
But not everyone on the listserv has looked kindly upon efforts to transform the network into a booster club for Romney, and a number of members have e-mailed complaints.
Matt Larsen, a member of the listserv, wrote last October: “I know I’m probably going to make enemies here, but I’m getting really tired of the ads for Romney campaign trips coming from this list serve. The disclaimer at the bottom of every list serve email states very clearly: ‘Items that will not be posted/that will be removed include: promoting your business, promoting political ideologies, and inflammatory comments and rhetoric.’”
The protests appear to have been ignored though, with members continuing to send out e-mails as recently as last month that requested volunteer help for Romney.
“The Colonial First Ward listserv seems to be a miraculous pro-Romney organizing tool,” grumbled one D.C.-area Mormon, who is a Democrat. “Whenever you get the contact information for 3,540 young Mormons in one place, I guess it has to be.”
Every religion is allowed to have members run for public office. Catholics, Protestants, Mormons, Scientologists, Kali death cult members, Voodoo priests, Communist atheists, you name it, they are allowed to run.
That isn't the issue.
The issue is how we, as voters, can select candidates whose beliefs are most in alignment with our own, and who we judge to be most likely to perform their offices in a manner that we will like.
As such, ANY quality or attribute of the candidate is a valid subject for consideration in making that evaluation: religion, race, ethnicity, political ideology, whatever.
If I decide his religious beliefs will make him act counter to what I desire, then that is a factor.
If I judge his race will be a factor, in the sense of having more loyalty or favoritism to fellow members than to those not of his race, then that will be a factor.
If I decide his ideology is counter to the direction I want the country to go in, then that will be a factor.
“That is an lds tactic”
So, can I interest you in watching a video that could save your life?
Romney was a high official, Bishops are high officials.
Romney was a Stake president, and a Bishop, I believe the only above him was the 12 Apostles and the Prophet himself.
As Stake President Romney was in charge of one of the 22 districts, or diocese.
Way to go, again dealing with items that have not been stated, changing the subject and answering questions that have not been asked.
Thinking you are really working hard for your TR. A+++
Nope.
Amazing isn’t, that lds think the rest of us are so ignorant of their obfuscating behavior because of mormonISM.
“Show me where I said what you are accusing me of”
I accuse you of nothing but not knowing the difference between second-person singular and second-person plural personal pronouns
Ah, sorry, you wouldn’t have said something so ignorant.
Your was the ever brilliant “No you shouldn’t” (Vote for a Mormon) in post #66 of this thread.
There is so much stupidity on this thread, it’s hard to keep it straight. I apologize for attributing the wrong stupid comment to you.
And yet you keep hanging around here...
Thanks!
“And yet you keep hanging around here...”
I came for the stupidity, and I stay for the humor.
(that was a good one...)
Mormons believe they will be "gods" with their own planets to rule over. And YOU think we should not expose that. You, sir, are a fool.
Got it. You come here because of your stupidity, and you think we’re stupid.
Projection. Just like a liberal.
No, HIGH officials are Apostles and members of the Council of 12. Bishops are pastors of wards. Stake presidents are in charge of the Bishops of all the wards in each stake (something like a diocese) My dad was a stake president, for instance, and a bishop. But he was NOT a HIGH official.
"Romney was a Stake president, and a Bishop, I believe the only above him was the 12 Apostles and the Prophet himself. As Stake President Romney was in charge of one of the 22 districts."
See above.
“Projection. Just like a liberal.”
I liked your last joke better. This one isn’t even funny.
“You, sir, are a fool.”
I may well be, but what is truly foolish is to claim that an American should not exercise his God-given freedoms and rights and run for office because you say he will be “controlled” by his religion.
You can vote your stupidity all you want. But you are awfully thin-skinned when it comes to being accountable for your un-American views on religious freedom.
Having 13 people above you as Stake president, and another 22 or so if you are a Bishop, sounds pretty high up for an international organization of millions.
It is. But a very flowery one....LOL!!
That would have been me I do feel like that voting for Romney is voting against Jesus. I feel the same way about zero So IF Newt isn’t nominated I will vote down ticket for good conservatives and write in Newt!!
Now let me explain why I feel this way!!!
Blasphemy- the crime of assuming to oneself the rights or qualities of God
Heresy-any belief or theory that is strongly at variance with established beliefs, customs, etc.
http://www.lifeafter.org/exaltedman.asp
http://www.simpledevotions.org/apologetics/mormonism/mormonjesusapolygamist.php
http://www.exmormon.org/mormon/mormon385.htm
http://www.mormonwiki.org/Conception_of_Jesus
http://bible-truth.org/jesusbro.htm
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.