Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: papertyger; metmom
One can not say Scripture is inerrant, but somebody's interpretation can not be inerrant, unless the person saying so claims inerrancy. Such a person commits the same act they criticize the Catholic Church for, but simply isn't smart enough to recognize that fact.

Jumping into a thread i have not been following recently, but did you mean to say “one can say Scripture is inerrant?” The “but” seems to be making a distinction.

288 posted on 02/14/2012 3:34:05 AM PST by daniel1212 (Trust in the Lord Jesus to save you as a contrite damned+morally destitute sinner + be forgiven+live)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies ]


To: daniel1212
... did you mean to say “one can say Scripture is inerrant?”

No.

289 posted on 02/14/2012 12:28:50 PM PST by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies ]

To: daniel1212
The “but” seems to be making a distinction.

My point in the sentence you ask about is you can not claim both the first clause AND the second clause without the third clause being true.

290 posted on 02/14/2012 12:34:01 PM PST by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson