Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/21/2011 9:46:04 AM PST by SeanG200
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SeanG200

The word “belief” stands out in the discussion, and Dawkins doesn’t seem to pick up on it ... and note that beliefs belong in church.


2 posted on 11/21/2011 9:54:55 AM PST by OldNavyVet (One trillion days, at 365 days per year, is 2,739,726,027 years ... almost 3 billion years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeanG200

Well, rape has been treated differently in different places, and different times, even considering only Christian countries.


7 posted on 11/21/2011 10:29:57 AM PST by MetaThought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeanG200
"Hear Evolutionists/Atheists Themselves on Evil & Ethics (like Rape for Instance)" Bump for later. Already, iI have tolerated my niece in her attempt to explain to me how I took religion too far and needed to, in her text, "GET OVER YOURSELF"(because I post religious articles on my facebook page). She explained how I should post "normal" things that people aren't offended to read. And how religion is simply man concocted to oppress people. That's enough atheism for me today.
10 posted on 11/21/2011 10:57:08 AM PST by jacknhoo (Luke 12:51. Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeanG200; betty boop; marron; Alamo-Girl; metmom; xzins; GodGunsGuts; Fichori; tpanther; ...
I don’t believe that there are any axiological claims which are absolutely true, except within the context of one person’s opinion.

Does this include the axiological claim that there are no axiological claims that are absolutely true?

They’re at it again BEEP!

11 posted on 11/21/2011 11:00:54 AM PST by YHAOS (you betcha!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeanG200
Logically Darwinian morals can only be focused on individual reproduction and self-promotion. What else matters in a strictly Darwinian world?

The perception of altruism might be useful, but only the perception, and only to the point when its not useful.

Darwinian morals means smothering grandma when no one is looking, and then crying loudly.

14 posted on 11/21/2011 11:49:20 AM PST by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson