[Charles Henrickson]

“But the challenge for the Missouri Synod on this whole issue is simply not to be the denomination of ‘no.’ ” he said. “It is my deep desire to refrain from statements against homosexuality, at the same time affirming the biblical stance and that the church has a role in assisting people who struggle with this issue,” Harrison said.

Look, I think I know what he means by this (if indeed this is being quoted correctly and in context). There is no doubt in my mind that Harrison regards homosexual behavior as sinful. And our synod maintained its strong stand against the sin of homosexuality once again last summer, when the convention adopted several resolutions against what the ELCA has done.

But I think Harrison's point is that we want to do more than just say "We're agin' it!" And we don't want to focus solely on that one sin. Plus, we want to make clear there is forgiveness for repentant homosexuals too.

[taxesareforever]

So, does it mean that the “Thou shall not...” commandments will also hold the same “refrain from statements against..” so as not to be a “denomination of no”? Where does it stop? I’m hoping that Harrison used a poor choice of words but, sadly, I believe his meaning is clear.

[Charles Henrickson]

“But the challenge for the Missouri Synod on this whole issue is simply not to be the denomination of ‘no.’ ” he said. “It is my deep desire to refrain from statements against homosexuality, at the same time affirming the biblical stance and that the church has a role in assisting people who struggle with this issue,” Harrison said.

Tell you what: I will be seeing Rev. Harrison later this week. If I have a chance, I will ask him about this.

[Vegasrugrat]

I pray that you are correct in your assessment.