Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: RJR_fan

Well, I looked for a point in there, a summation, and there was none to be found?

“Yes” Christ condemned Jerusalem that is well known, is the write attempting to say..what, exactly?


6 posted on 02/04/2011 11:58:31 AM PST by padre35 (You shall not ignore the laws of God, the Market, the Jungle, and Reciprocity Rm10.10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: padre35
I think it obvious that this is an attempt to say that Jews are not Jews, Israel isn't Israel, Jerusalem isn't Jerusalem, and Zion isn't Zion.

Much along the same lines as Vernon Howell (aka David Koresh) thought that when the Bible said “the Temple in Jerusalem” it meant their compound in Waco Texas, and where the Bible said “the people of Israel” he meant a bunch of European descended Texans.

Absolute rot. As others have indicated.

90 posted on 02/07/2011 11:30:49 AM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: padre35

Well, the article does come from the American Vision site...so that explains much. Pretty much Replacement Theology, of which the poster has often posted in the past.


101 posted on 02/07/2011 12:12:46 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson