You need to re read the article. The suit alleges the existence of such tapes and photographs and the boys in question were not disabled.
And I promise you that no child was allowed to leave any school campus with an adult without the permission of the parents. Public or private schools by that time had strict policies in place about who could or could not pick up kids. Heck even non custodial parents had to get put on the approved list. So either the guy did a good forgery of parental signatures or it never happened.
“He would routinely go in and take them out of the school sometimes for the entire day,” said the boys’ attorney Devon Bruce, adding that none of the parents was told Mason took their children out of school.
Both the Chicago Archdiocese and the Presbytery of Chicago were alerted in 1999 after a teacher received a tape one of the boys made for Mason in which the boy talked about sex, Bruce said. The Chicago bishop was named in the lawsuit because the Archdiocese oversees the school.
_______________________________________________________
Now, what were you saying about “I promise you that no child was allowed to leave any school campus with an adult without the permission of the parents”?
Who needs to re-read the article?
Why do I care if you say you are Catholic? We’re discussing Presbyterians, here.