Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee
U-2012>As Peter notes, Paul is sometime hard to understand.

Which is why I really on two thousand years of Church teaching and ignore the seemingly endless new conclusions that are reached by those employing the 16th century man-made invention of YOPIOS.

I use the First Century for interpretation.

I consider nothing after the book of Revelation.

shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua HaMashiach
413 posted on 10/26/2009 12:18:29 PM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your law is my delight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 412 | View Replies ]


To: UriÂ’el-2012; NYer; narses; Petronski; Mad Dawg
I use the First Century for interpretation. I consider nothing after the book of Revelation.

There is absolutely no reason to believe that a single person had even seen the totality of what we know as the New Testament in the first century and it is certain that many in the first century would have been reading what the Church later rejected from the canon of Scripture.

415 posted on 10/26/2009 12:28:35 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 413 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson