My conclusion is correct. You missed the point I was trying to make. If you would know with 100% certainty that a bolt, washer and nut had an intelligent designer, how much more sure should you be with something like human DNA?If nature won’t form three things that fit together well so as to form a bolt, washer and nut, just how do you dream it formed, over any period of time, the complex human organism.
You are suffering from the “I have the magic spark of truth in me” syndrome. Just because you want something to be true that doesn’t make it true.
“You are suffering from the I have the magic spark of truth in me syndrome. Just because you want something to be true that doesnt make it true.”
The article makes claims that aren’t true, mainly that preserved soft tissue was found. I am appropriately skeptical of everything else in the article because the conclusions are not supported by what has been found.
How am I suffering from a syndrome? How are you not suffering from the aforementioned syndrome?
Intelligent Design, like “creation science” in general, suffers from “wishful thinking” upfront - they make no secret that whatever is found, it will support creationism, no matter what is found.