Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: count-your-change; RFEngineer

Curious... Are you (C-Y-C) able to accept that we can extract liquid oil from solid oil shale and tar sand through a chemical process called pyrolysis?

While this is admittedly a somewhat poor comparison, the idea is generally (VERY generally) the same. A solid rock/mineral is exposed to a chemical process that removes mineralization and produces a more workable substance of the same chemical make-up.

I hope this helps you understand a tad better. Again, this miniscule fossil that has the creationists so strangely excited was not the bronto-burger some would have us believe.


162 posted on 10/14/2009 10:35:01 AM PDT by whattajoke (Let's keep Conservatism real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]


To: whattajoke
I think I understand, I once used muriatic acid to remove minerals from cast iron. When I removed the minerals I had no minersls left and what was left was of a much different chemical makeup.

But pyrolysis (to breakdown by heat) is a bit different, it's using heat to “cook” off various components of a light weight in tar sands and oil shales.

The Nat.Geo. reference I left and the links provided in the May 1, 2009, ScienceDaily demonstrate that paloentologists are just as or more exicited than the creationists over dino proteins and collogen, etc.

163 posted on 10/14/2009 12:08:33 PM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson