[count-your-change]

The ICR can defend it's self if it needs to, what I ask is a bit sticking to the subject at hand and not wandering off into the wilderness of what was not said. Credibility and all.

But since you make this comment about the credibility of the author, “The article author misrepresented the quoted research per previous posts. However, that sort of article is fully in line with most ICR “research”.”, can you point to just what you're talking about? And about that sequencing stone and minerals? How are coming along with that?

[RFEngineer]

see post #132, I know you don’t believe it, but that is what they did.