[RFEngineer]

You can’t just declare something a religion just because it makes it convenient to argue against it that way. You gotta bring something more than just a juvenile association game.

Surely you can frame a better argument than “Origin of the Species” is equivalent to the Bible, when you know that is a inane assertion. Nobody actually believes that - except maybe for you (but I doubt you do - your argument is too half-hearted)

Evolutionists are very often Christian (almost all that I know are), I know a number of folks object to that, but it’s not their place to judge, even though the ICR says we’re going to hell.

[tpanther]

Evolutionists are very often Christian (almost all that I know are), I know a number of folks object to that, but it’s not their place to judge, even though the ICR says we’re going to hell.

---

Uh-huh...how many high profile liberals do you know that are creationists?

[count-your-change]

Now, now, be nice and don't start with the “when you know” stuff since even an RF engineer can't read minds. And I still haven't found where ICR said you're going to hell.

“Evolutionists are very often Christian (almost all that I know are),...”

And is that not a judgment? Like “it's not their place to judge”.

Anyway after that small diversion, did you actually read the article? Where was the stone and minerals sequenced? And how can one do that?