Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Alamo-Girl

That really is not very convincing to me, and I’m sure it’s not to many other Christians as well. Either there was a literal global Flood 4000-some years ago or there was not. You say there was not. Many other Christians say there was. Since the two options are mutually exclusive, that means one or the other of you must be wrong. You think that you are right (otherwise hopefully you would change your opinion, there doesn’t seem to be a good reason for embracing an opinion one knows is wrong. . .), that means you must think that the others are wrong. This isn’t some squishy “believe whatever you think is prettiest” thing, it’s a historical event that either did happen or did not.


721 posted on 08/14/2008 9:58:03 AM PDT by ahayes ("Impenetrability! That's what I say!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 657 | View Replies ]


To: ahayes; MHGinTN; betty boop; YHAOS
You think that you are right ... that means you must think that the others are wrong.

False. For one to be "right" the other is not ipso facto "wrong."

Read again my post number 657 or if you prefer, my expanded post on another thread.

The Law of the Excluded Middle does not apply to the Creator.

For my thoughts [are] not your thoughts, neither [are] your ways my ways, saith the LORD. For [as] the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts. – Isaiah 55:8-9

There is a tendency among men - even theologians - to apply such mutually exclusive either/or logic to God. And when they do, it leads to discord and error.

Examples include Predestination v. Free Will, Earthy Messiah v. Eternal/Transcendent Messiah, God is One v. God is Father, Son and Holy Spirit, God's revelation in Scripture v. God's revelation in the Creation.

I find it strange that men continue to do this even knowing that the Law of the Excluded Middle isn't universal in a physical sense either, e.g. wave/particle duality, speed of light physical limitation v. non-locality at distance.

It certainly isn't applicable to God, i.e. the Trinity, and therefore, the Christian himself:

But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his. - Romans 8:9

But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his. - Romans 8:9

For ye are dead, and your life is hid with Christ in God. - Colossians 3:3

To God be the glory!

725 posted on 08/14/2008 11:00:11 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 721 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson