Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Ethan Clive Osgoode

A solar eclipse shows apparent position not actual position. At the exact instant that you see a solar eclipse the suns actual position is already 8.3 minutes beyond that point.

Do you really believe that the speed of light is instantaneous? The only way that the the suns apparent position and actual position could be the same is if the the speed of light was instantaneous.


603 posted on 07/11/2008 8:35:47 AM PDT by LeGrande
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 601 | View Replies ]


To: LeGrande; mrjesse
At the exact instant that you see a solar eclipse the suns actual position is already 8.3 minutes beyond that point.

Let us place this comment alongside your earlier comment in post 533:

The Sun is only 2.1 degrees behind strictly in relationship to an observer on the earth, in a two body model... Adding a third body invalidates the two body model. [LeGrande, 533]

At the exact instant that you see a solar eclipse the suns actual position is already 8.3 minutes beyond that point. [LeGrande, 603]

The logical inconsistency of this is striking. On the one hand, you say that your 2.1 degree solar lag theory is only true if there is no moon, while on the other hand the Sun is off by 2.1 degrees during a solar eclipse anyway. It is evident, then, that it matters not one whit to you whether "the model" (i.e., "the excuse", "the distraction", "the waste of time") is true or false.
624 posted on 07/12/2008 10:07:17 PM PDT by Ethan Clive Osgoode (<<== Click here to learn about Darwinism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 603 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson