Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: LeGrande; Ethan Clive Osgoode
A star with a distance of 1 light year would have to orbit the observer at 3.14x the speed of light to get 180 degrees away from its apparent position.
"At least you agree that a stars apparent position is not its actual position. Ethan seems to think that even the most distant star is exactly where we see it."
Care to explain how the star is going to break warp 0.9?

566 posted on 07/10/2008 4:42:32 PM PDT by Fichori (Primitive goat herder, Among those who kneel before a man; Standing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 564 | View Replies ]


To: Fichori
Care to explain how the star is going to break warp 0.9?

No. Luckily that is not what I am claiming : ) Although I have read some serious hypothesis that make the claim that the speed of light was faster just after the big bang.

I am simply trying to explain that the apparent position (where you see them) of celestial objects is different from their actual position. I never would have guessed that this simple concept would be so hard to explain. I now have even more sympathy for Giordano Bruno.

568 posted on 07/10/2008 5:02:44 PM PDT by LeGrande
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 566 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson