post 447[LeGrande] In other words when you look at the Sun, you are seeing it about 7 minutes behind where it actually is, but if you had a sensitive gravity sensor where would it point? At the sun you see or 7 minutes ahead of the sun you see?post 469[mrjesse] this [is] how it would be if the sun were orbiting the earth... if gravity "traveled" instantly (which I think was a basis for your question) then indeed, the sun's gravity would be 2.13 degrees ahead of its visual location... But the sun doesn't orbit the earth! Other way around!post 488[LeGrande] You seem unable or unwilling to try and grasp simple concepts that disagree with your world view. My example was simple, is the sun where it appears to be when you look at it? Or is it ahead of where it appears to be? You seem to think that it is where it appears to be, you are wrong.post 489[ECO] the sun is where mrjesse says it is.post 496[LeGrande] MrJesse is claiming that... the sun is in exactly the same place that we see it, when we see it. You seem to agree, according to your equation and statement "the sun is where mrjesse says it is." Both of you are wrong, we see the Sun where it was 8 minutes ago when the photons were emitted.post 504[mrjesse] Can you find anyone at nasa who plans space missions and who agrees with you? The more I hear of your idea the more crazy it sounds.post 525[LeGrande] LOL They all agree with me... May I suggest "Physics for Dummy's"...
[ECO] Is the moon's apparent position off by more than 2.1 degrees from its actual position? Or less?post 529[LeGrande] The lag is a little over a second.
The Collapse of the LeGrandeic System of Astrophysics
Look LeGrande, no lag! The Sun, the moon, and the observer on Earth... all lined up.
Solar Eclipse
Solar Eclipses for Beginners
