To: egarvue
Do you mean to tell me that sex, within the bounds of marriage, should be for procreation only?All sexual intercourse should (1) take place in the context of a true marriage and (2) maintain its potential for procreation at all times.
In other words, no sexual intercourse should take place solely for procreation - but all acts of sexual intercourse should embrace, unhindered, the possibility of procreation.
13 posted on
09/22/2003 8:42:44 AM PDT by
wideawake
(God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
To: wideawake
In other words, no sexual intercourse should take place solely for procreation - but all acts of sexual intercourse should embrace, unhindered, the possibility of procreation.I think I know what answer I will get--I've come across your type before--but you seem to be saying that you are opposed to all birth control, which is a ludicrous position. Even the Catholic Church maintains that its members can use non-artificial means to limit their families. Question: How many children do you have? Not 50? Why not?
To: wideawake
In other words, no sexual intercourse should take place solely for procreation - but all acts of sexual intercourse should embrace, unhindered, the possibility of procreation. Are you saying that after my wife's hysterectomy, which was 23 years ago, I should have started sleeping on the couch? What a cold and loveless life you must lead.
To: wideawake
All sexual intercourse should (1) take place in the context of a true marriage and (2) maintain its potential for procreation at all times. It's a sin to operate ceiling fans 1.) on Tuesdays, or 2.) in the presence of a Turk.
146 posted on
09/24/2003 6:51:35 PM PDT by
Sloth
("I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!" -- Jacobim Mugatu, 'Zoolander')
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson