Voting machine controversy

Cleveland Plain Dealer via Drudge Report ^ | August 31, 2002 | Julie Carr Smyth

[upchuck]

Whether the folks at Diebold lean left or right, it appears their electronic voting software is in big trouble^.

[Theyknow]

Who has ever heard of the Serria Times?

The point here which most of us agree is that these machines are manfactured by the good guys and that is why the DUmmies are so afraid of them. We can win fair and square so why cheat? Either way, even if the manfactures have a bias it is favorable to our side, so this isn't our issue.

PS I don't think that posting stuff here brings it to enough of a broader audience that it makes a difference.

[aruanan]

What Americalover said.

[sauropod]

I thought that CFR was supposed to take care of stuff like this. /sarc

[TheSarce]

Voting machines ping.

[upchuck]

The article I cited was published many places. I just picked the Sierra Times.

Go do a Google search on "Bev Harris" and Diebold. You'll see what I mean.

If her research is even close to being right, people voting via Diebold Accu-Vote machines could easily have their vote corrupted.

[cyberbob]

fine,
need a more credible source? then slashdot. EVEN if they dont do it themselves, they leave their machines open to attack from others partisan or not- Looking simply from the security aspect of things - this company is obviously not competent enough to be trusted with one of our nation's most cherished liberties, DUmmies are afraid of them. REtards trust them... what to do? drop diebold...for now, at least until a full investigation can be done

p.s. - good guys? since when has the term "good guys" meant - people who leave the very systems that we use to secure our freedom open to attack? which leads me to the question - which do you care more about - the well being of our country or the well being of your party?