Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA officials put off chance for spy agency photo of Columbia
Florida Today ^ | March 15, 2003 | Todd Halvorson and Larry Wheeler

Posted on 07/26/2003 2:05:02 PM PDT by snopercod

Edited on 05/07/2004 6:04:10 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

A top NASA official disclosed Friday he turned down an offer from a U.S. spy agency to use a secret satellite to photograph suspected damage to the shuttle Columbia while in orbit.

It was the first acknowledgement by a NASA official that talk of damage to the doomed shuttle reached the top echelons of the space agency.


(Excerpt) Read more at floridatoday.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Florida; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: columbia; nasa; shuttle
This is an old article, but never posted here AFAIK.

What I find interesting is that the original request for the photos came from a United Space Alliance contractor at Kennedy Space Center. The "Ministry of Truth" in Houston has been busy covering up that fact.

1 posted on 07/26/2003 2:05:02 PM PDT by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bonesmccoy; XBob; wirestripper; NormsRevenge; tubebender; anymouse
flag
2 posted on 07/26/2003 2:07:31 PM PDT by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
No Firings MEANS ===> NO ACCOUNTABILITY
3 posted on 07/26/2003 2:12:58 PM PDT by Diogenesis (If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
they used Teal Amber or Teal Blue space surveillance cameras (ground-based) to look over Columbia on her maiden launch in 1981 ... I asked why they didn't when they knew about the foam ... I'm sure they would have had to possibly scrub their mission or parts of it, but it would have been worth it ... I think one of these cameras is in Hawaii and the other is at Beale AFB or Buckly AFB or on the East Coast ... I'll have to look it up on FAS.org again ...
4 posted on 07/26/2003 2:30:49 PM PDT by Bobby777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: snopercod; leadpenny
Wow!

Leadpenny....fyi.

5 posted on 07/26/2003 2:30:52 PM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
If amateurs with
off-the-shelf equipment can
get space station pics

like this one, just think
what clear pics the black ops types
can get with "active

imaging" and all
the other tricks those guys have.
If NASA really

declined black ops help,
then the NASA officials
are worse than we think...
6 posted on 07/26/2003 2:45:28 PM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
>>...Gehman said. "Obviously both sides were at fault in our opinion."...<<

Is he referring to NASA and the DOD?

I don't think the DOD is at fault for anything. Sounds to me that they were ready, willing and able to provide support.

7 posted on 07/26/2003 3:01:05 PM PDT by FReepaholic (My other tag line is hilarious.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tscislaw
The people on the shuttle were in danger and the NASA folks knew it, they ordered them down while they kept their fingers crossed and then when the shuttle was destroyed they lied.
8 posted on 07/26/2003 4:00:31 PM PDT by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
Bureaucratic paralysis is a interesting thing to observe.

Unfortunately, this time it led to fatal consequences.

It is likely true that there was little that could be done without putting more lives at risk. Perhaps this is the missing link in this scenario that nobody has the balls to speak about.(except for the guy that resigned, Dittmore.sp)

Now that his cohorts have had their say, I find that he was probably more truthful in his answers. The rest of them are lying like rugs and omitting facts.

9 posted on 07/26/2003 4:57:59 PM PDT by Cold Heat (Negotiate!! .............(((Blam!.)))........... "Now who else wants to negotiate?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theFIRMbss
If NASA really declined black ops help, then the NASA officials are worse than we think...

Yup. Whenever government f-s up, you can count on what gets released to the public is only a fraction of the total scope of the f-up.

NASA literally could not be bothered to try to save lives. The shame of this cannot be overstated.

10 posted on 07/26/2003 7:10:57 PM PDT by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
....and a NASA team had already determined the shuttle was in no danger.

There is your no accountability right there.

I believe the term a few years ago was
"No Controlling Authority"

11 posted on 07/26/2003 7:17:59 PM PDT by Delta 21 (God Bless America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
Another good question. Why didn't they try that shocking foam-through-the-wing test before using it on the space shuttle? Didn't they know that the foam could flake off? Hasn't experience shown that seemingly innocuous things travelling at high speeds can become deadly projectiles?
12 posted on 07/26/2003 7:31:39 PM PDT by Gritty-Kitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gritty-Kitty
by it's very nature the shuttle was never intended to take impacts ... it was designed, rather its tiles, to dissipate heat efficiently ... reportedly, you can punch a tile with your fist and damage it quite a bit ... and once heat gets through (at those temperatures) to the frame, well you've got trouble ...

but, especially since Challenger (1986), launch tapes are reviewed as soon as possible to evaluate the launch (Challenger can be seen with significant black smoke coming out of one of the solid booster seams) ... of course, with Challenger, by the time the launch tapes would be reviewed (multiple high-speed cameras at multiple angles) it was too late anyway ...
13 posted on 07/27/2003 1:08:44 AM PDT by Bobby777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
2 - I really love the NASA incident reporting system:

"It was the first acknowledgement by a NASA official that talk of damage to the doomed shuttle reached the top echelons of the space agency. "

14 posted on 07/27/2003 4:46:27 AM PDT by XBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gritty-Kitty
Didn't they know that the foam could flake off?

It didn't used to be much of a problem until NASA decided to brown-nose AlGore and switch to "enviornmentally-friendly" (e.g. astronaut-killing) solvents, adhesives, and blowing agents.

15 posted on 07/27/2003 3:21:38 PM PDT by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
Does Eisenhower's edict of separation of military and space enter into this?
16 posted on 07/27/2003 3:25:14 PM PDT by ex-snook (American jobs need BALANCED TRADE. We buy from you, you buy from us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002
Welcome to FR. If you are really interested in how this all unfolded, check out this thread:

Observation on TPS damage on Orbiter

17 posted on 07/27/2003 3:32:54 PM PDT by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
makes you sick... don't it?

head in sand = good day.
18 posted on 07/27/2003 5:16:26 PM PDT by bonesmccoy (Defeat the terrorists... Vaccinate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson