Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boy Scouts call for community help to replace United Way funding
The Miami Herald ^ | 5/15/03 | Elaine De Valle

Posted on 05/15/2003 12:45:09 PM PDT by RonF

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: JulieRNR21

41 posted on 05/16/2003 5:29:01 AM PDT by Joe Brower (http://www.joebrower.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
Dave, I know you're from CA, but I'm giving you our hammer and sickle governor.
42 posted on 05/16/2003 6:34:10 AM PDT by Archie Bunker on steroids
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: breakem
Notice the BSA did not deny it, as far as we know. Why would they enter into an agreement that was contrary to their values and then not meet it. Let's hear the denial and I'll withdraw.

After reading up on this as much as I can, here's what seems to have happened.

The central point seems to be that the local Council was being asked to have their leaders take training on how to deal with issues of youth and sexual identity. Apparently this training was to not only include trying to understand the issues and emotions that a young man who was confused about his sexual identity would be feeling, but also to teach the leaders to refer such a young man to organizations outside of his own family and religion.

The former is acceptable. You need to understand young people's emotions and developmental stages to be able to work with them effectively. However, the latter is unacceptable, as the purpose of the BSA is to support and supplement a Scout's family and religious community, not to provide an alternative to them. BSA leaders will only refer a Scout elsewhere in cases of abuse, and then only to the proper authorities.

Now, it may be that the local Council may have agreed in principle for "sensitivity training" for their leaders without getting a detailed agreement on what that training's curriculum was to be. That was an error, which they should admit.

It may be that there was a proper agreement, but that the local gay advocacy groups tried to change the rules after the agreement was signed. That should be made public, if true.

Finally, it may be thatt the local Council was willing to do what was being asked, but that National Council found out the details and (properly) overrode them. If this is the actual case, I doubt that National will make this public. But, if the local Scout Executive is replaced soon, I'll come to figure that this is the most likely scenario.

43 posted on 05/16/2003 6:54:36 AM PDT by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: j_tull
Please see my post #43.
44 posted on 05/16/2003 6:56:30 AM PDT by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: RonF
Thanx for the info
45 posted on 05/16/2003 9:04:31 AM PDT by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower
That is a gorgeous BUMP!

I put a note with my donation saying that I hoped that supporters would send even more than the United Way would have given them.
46 posted on 05/16/2003 1:17:54 PM PDT by JulieRNR21 (Take W-04........Across America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson