Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Official Says Iran Must Come Clean About Nuclear Program, Face More Inspections
AP ^ | 4/28/03 | Jonathan Fowler

Posted on 04/28/2003 2:25:31 PM PDT by Jean S

GENEVA (AP) - Iran must come clean about its nuclear program and submit to increased inspections by a global monitoring body, a U.S. official told an international conference Monday.

"Despite professions of transparency and peaceful intent, Iran is going down the same path of denial and deception that handicapped international inspections in North Korea and Iraq," said John Wolf, U.S. assistant secretary of state for nonproliferation.

"We have seen the pattern of cheat and retreat before - of begrudging compromises on process but obstinacy on real disclosure," Wolf said at the opening of a two-week meeting on the 1968 Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. The conference is one of the meetings that precedes a review of the 188-nation accord in 2005.

There was no immediate reaction to Wolf's remarks from Iran. In the past, Iranian officials have said they have nothing to hide because their nuclear program is only meant to generate electricity.

The United States has accused Iran, which is building a nuclear power plant in the southern part of the country, of having secret plans to produce nuclear weapons.

The International Atomic Energy Agency oversees compliance with the nonproliferation treaty. The head of the Vienna-based agency visited Iranian nuclear sites - including a uranium mine - in February and is expected to report to the agency's board in June.

Wolf said the agency should get tough in its probes of Iran's program.

"What is presented as 'compliance' may in fact not be real," he said. "The International Atomic Energy needs to ask the hard questions and get complete answers.

"It needs to go wherever necessary to find the truth and it needs to measure each answer against Iran's pattern to date of denial and deception," Wolf said.

Under the nonproliferation treaty, the declared nuclear powers of the 1960s - the United States, China, France, Russia and Britain - were meant to reduce their arsenals, try to stop the spread of nuclear weapons and ensure nuclear technology was only used for peaceful purposes. However, the accord has failed to stop the growth in the number of nuclear powers.

AP-ES-04-28-03 1703EDT


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: iran; johnwolf; nukes; proliferation; southasia; southasialist; statedept

1 posted on 04/28/2003 2:25:31 PM PDT by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JeanS
batter up !
2 posted on 04/28/2003 2:28:11 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
...their nuclear program is only meant to generate electricity.

How come a country that rich in petroleum needs nuclear power?
3 posted on 04/28/2003 3:05:37 PM PDT by BJClinton (Al Sharpton for President! http://www.sharptonexplore2004.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *southasia_list
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
4 posted on 04/28/2003 3:06:17 PM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RusIvan
PING!
5 posted on 04/28/2003 11:01:54 PM PDT by Orion78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Orion78
Yes it is time to bomb. Those enrichment plants.
6 posted on 04/29/2003 11:45:47 AM PDT by RusIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RusIvan
Alright, you guys over there in Russia get on it then. We will deal with North Korea and China. I doubt few in the U.S.A. would object if Russia bombed Iran's Uranium Enrichment Plant. Show us you are with us; it's not too late for you guys to be on the right side. You should have been with us against Iraq.

In fact, you wouldn't even have to bomb Iran's plant to get on our good side. All you guys have to do is quit selling research time in your wind tunnels to the Iranians, quit selling them materials used to build enrichment plants (i.e. high strenght aluminum), and stop building the Bushehr Reactor. Surely Russia's relationship with the United States, who has helped you in countless ways since 1991, isn't worth losing over a couple of 'business' deals with Iran? Wouldn't you agree?

I am all for Russia and the U.S. cooperating to rid the world of tyrants, terrorists and WMD's. I offer this gesture to show my sincerity. If you send your local representative a letter or email, and tell him/her you support U.S. and Russian cooperation in the bombing of the Natanz plant in Iran, I will do the same. I can even vouch for a couple other people I know personally who will do the same. What do you say?

7 posted on 04/29/2003 5:54:56 PM PDT by Orion78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson