Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

POWELL: NO QUID PRO QUO WITH TURKEY
United Press International ^ | 3/21/2003 4:41 PM | Eli J. Lake

Posted on 03/21/2003 2:14:44 PM PST by henbane

Powell: No quid pro quo with Turkey

By Eli J. Lake
UPI State Department Correspondent

From the

International

Desk

Published 3/21/2003 4:41 PM

WASHINGTON, March 21 (UPI) -- Secretary of State Colin Powell Friday told Turkey there was "no need" to send troops into Kurdish-controlled Northern Iraq.

He made the comment after all-night talks between U.S. and Turkish officials aimed at preventing Ankara from making the move, which was authorized by the Turkish parliament Thursday.

The Turks have said they need a military presence in Northern Iraq to control the expected flood of war refugees seeking to cross the border into Turkey.

But observers say the dominant reason is Turkish resolve to prevent the Kurds from taking advantage of the present conflict in Iraq to form a breakaway independent state. The Turks fear a Kurdish state on their doorstep could incite their own Kurdish minority to seek independence.

"We are in contact with them about their desire to have a presence in Northern Iraq," Powell said. "At the moment, we don't see a need for any Turkish incursions into Northern Iraq."

On Thursday, the Turkish parliament passed legislation allowing U.S. military use of Turkish airspace in the war against Iraq. The same resolution authorized the Turkish army to deploy troops in Northern Iraq.

When the United States objected to the linkage between the overflight rights and troop deployment in Iraq, the Turkish government said it would delay the permission.

But following all-night negotiations and a phone conversation Friday between Powell and Turkish Prime Minister Recip Tayyeb Erdogan, diplomatic sources said, U.S. combat planes were again allowed to fly over Turkish territory.

However, the issue of whether Turkish troops would go into Kurdish territory apparently remained unresolved. Powell said the overflights and the troop incursions were separate issues, and the question of whether Turkey could send the military to Northern Iraq would be discussed later.

"Our position is that these two items should be separable," Powell said Friday. "Let's deal with the overflight issue, and deal with the need for making sure that there is not a disturbance along the Turkey-Iraq border," he said.

The Turks have said any troops in Northern Iraq would stay out of the present fighting. The Kurds, who are lightly armed and no match for the Turkish military, are apprehensive at the prospect of a sizeable presence of Turkish troops in their midst.

U.S. planes had been flying on regular missions over the no-fly zones in the north and south of Iraq from the Turkish air base at Incirlik since 1991.

Ankara's desire to position troops of its own in Northern Iraq has bedeviled U.S. efforts to negotiate access for 60,000 U.S. troops through Turkey to establish a northern front in Iraq. An earlier agreement would have allowed Turkish troops into Northern Iraq but the Pentagon quickly reversed this quid pro quo.

Earlier this month, the Turkish parliament rejected legislation that would allow the United States the basing rights for ground troops and in the process lost their best opportunity for a multi-billion dollar aid package.

-0-

(Anwar Iqbal in Washington and Seva Ulman in Ankara contributed to this article.)


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iraq; powell; turkey; turkeytroops; turknoncooperation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
The Turks have said they need a military presence in Northern Iraq to control the expected flood of war refugees seeking to cross the border into Turkey.

On Thursday, the Turkish parliament passed legislation allowing U.S. military use of Turkish airspace in the war against Iraq. The same resolution authorized the Turkish army to deploy troops in Northern Iraq.

The Turks better stay the hell out of Northern Iraq.

The phony "control of refugees" motive is just a euphemism for rounding up the Kurds and tossing them into concentration camps.

If the Turks move across the border into Iraq, there will be confusion and bloodshed on all sides. The resultant scenes of stacked Kurdish bodies and Mideastern prisoners haggard and gaunt behind barbed wire will provide a wealth of photo ops for the world press who are just aching for these kinds of pics of war horror to smear America and the Bush Administration.

Repeat: the Turks must stay the hell out of Northern Iraq.

1 posted on 03/21/2003 2:14:44 PM PST by henbane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: henbane
Looks like Powell has had epiphanies on a few levels recently ...
2 posted on 03/21/2003 2:19:32 PM PST by Bobby777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: henbane
I fear you are correct. The world Leftist press would seize upon any Turkish atrocities on the Kurds and immediately blame them on the U.S.

It would be "Sabra and Shatila Part 2."

3 posted on 03/21/2003 2:21:46 PM PST by denydenydeny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: henbane
If the Turks enter Northern Iraq we won't stop them and they will have the run of the place.
4 posted on 03/21/2003 2:24:00 PM PST by caltrop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: henbane
Turkey's behavior during the past several months...has been by far the most disappointing -- after France/Germany?Belgium...

Their opportunity to seal a friendly and reliable relationship with the U.S...was "squandered".

Semper Fi
5 posted on 03/21/2003 2:25:09 PM PST by river rat (War works......It brings Peace... Give war a chance to destroy Jihadists...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: river rat
yeah, we need to keep an eye on those guys. they've got their own agenda - if they wanted to be aboard, they should have been there from "go".
6 posted on 03/21/2003 2:27:15 PM PST by hardcor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: river rat
Turkey's behavior during the past several months...has been by far the most disappointing -- after France/Germany/Belgium...

Don't forget Canada and Mexico.

7 posted on 03/21/2003 2:29:29 PM PST by NewYorker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: henbane
too bad. quid pro quo can be very good with turkey, and is a welcome change from the traditional dressing, gravy, and cranberry sauce.

though it is more often served with crow.

dep

8 posted on 03/21/2003 2:31:52 PM PST by dep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caltrop
Powell should just send them the video of the goings-on
in metropolitan Bagdad earlier today.
9 posted on 03/21/2003 2:36:12 PM PST by dwilli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dep
..served with crow.

Ahhh...so it's quid pro crow.

Is that with or without the beak?

10 posted on 03/21/2003 2:39:58 PM PST by evad ("We'll put a boot in yer ass...it's the American way"..Toby)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: henbane
Hopefully Powell did more than say the Turks "are not needed."

What we should do is put some airborne troops right on the border and tell the Turks (who could probably run them over) that if they attack our troops we'll respond with air attacks against both the attacking force and major Turkish assets elsewhere in Turkey.

That's the way to settle the issue, with no bloodshed. (Being a skeptic as to the chutzpah of the Bush team, I'm doubtful we'll go that route. Notice how in the interest of having a positive attitude during war, I did not call them "Bushies.")
11 posted on 03/21/2003 2:48:20 PM PST by Goodman26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: henbane
Remember the words "You're either with us or against us." Turkey made their choice clear, so the only thing they need to do is stay the hell out of the way. It would really be a shame if they got hit by a few hundred errant bombs.
12 posted on 03/21/2003 3:14:07 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caltrop
...they will have the run of the place.

Not going to happen. Turkey is a lost cause and has been ever since this President took office. They will be running for their disgusting lives if they cross into Iraq.

13 posted on 03/21/2003 3:24:21 PM PST by eleni121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
This could all work out for the best, and one day we may be thanking God that Turkey stayed out of it all. We can better deal with the Kurds without them, and the Kurds are people, too.
14 posted on 03/21/2003 3:25:33 PM PST by tessalu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: eleni121
People are posting on different threads that CNN and CBS are reporting that Turkish troops have entered Northern Iraq.
15 posted on 03/21/2003 3:27:39 PM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Goodman26
Hopefully Powell did more than say the Turks "are not needed."

In diplomatic speak, "are not needed" roughly translates to "If we find your troops in northern Iraq, we'll put a boot up your ass!" The Turks have to have noticed the 5 carrier battle groups we have in the neighborhood. Now is NOT the time to play hard ball with us.

16 posted on 03/21/2003 3:35:17 PM PST by Orangedog (Soccer-Moms are the biggest threat to your freedoms and the republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: henbane
The Turks better stay the hell out of Northern Iraq.

Yeah.

I hope we never trade that off.

17 posted on 03/21/2003 3:46:55 PM PST by The Other Harry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: henbane
>> Secretary of State Colin Powell Friday told Turkey there was "no need" to send troops into Kurdish-controlled Northern Iraq.

The EU and UN told you there was no need to go to Irak! Everyone decide for themselves!


The US and Turkey won't shoot at each other.

But just like you will not sit at home waiting for the next terror attack, we won't either.
18 posted on 03/21/2003 4:02:35 PM PST by a_Turk (After all the jacks are in their boxes, and the clowns have all gone to bed..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
People are posting on different threads that CNN and CBS are reporting that Turkish troops have entered Northern Iraq.

Charles Krauthammer on Brit Hume's Report tonight claims that the basic reason Turkey nixed American troops on the ground was to keep the Turkey-Iraq border clear of our forces. Turkey wanted to eliminate any U.S. restraining force once the Iraq War got underway.

The Turks, according to Krauthammer, will open up a Second Front on the Kurds. If these other threads are factual, we will soon have a helluva mess on our hands just as the Battle of Baghdad begins.

19 posted on 03/21/2003 4:09:55 PM PST by henbane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: henbane
Turkey Determined Its Policy On Iraq Long Time Ago (Blame the military not the "ruling" party)
20 posted on 03/21/2003 4:31:14 PM PST by Destro (Fight Islamic terrorisim by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson