Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fake diamond scam puts jeweler under pressure
bostonherald ^ | 3-15-03 | Kay Lazar

Posted on 03/15/2003 2:33:28 PM PST by Jimmyclyde

Fake diamond scam puts jeweler under pressure

by Kay Lazar Saturday, March 15, 2003

Diamonds may be a girl's best friend, but not when they turn out to be fake.

That's the allegation in Marlboro, where Kenneth's Fine Jewelry is accused of switching diamonds for cubic zirconia stones when women brought in their engagement rings to be cleaned or repaired.

``I was just shocked,'' said Laura Wagner, who found out in late January that the $4,200 diamond solitaire that she brought to Kenneth's in 1996 to be resized was switched.

Wagner said the ring never left her finger before Kenneth's worked on it. She said another local jeweler alerted her that it was a fake recently when she brought it in for repairs.

Wagner said that when she marched over to the Marlboro Police Department to file a complaint, detectives there said they were well aware of the problem.

``It has been referred to the Attorney General's Office, and we are working together with them,'' Marlboro police Chief Mark Leonard said yesterday, adding his office has 14 reports of fraud or larceny involving the jewelry store since 1996, all involving allegedly switched diamonds.

A spokeswoman for Kenneth's yesterday said they tracked the problem to an outside vendor who performed repairs for the shop in 1996, and that the store stopped using that vendor three months later when problems began to surface.

But other customers don't buy that story. Traci Kelleher said the 14-stone diamond ring her fiance bought from Kenneth's in 1992 turned out to be fake - even though owner Kenneth Powers himself verified it as legit, not realizing that an undercover police officer was watching the conversation in July 1993.

Kelleher said when her fiance returned to the shop with the officer and confronted Powers, he agreed to exchange the ring for a real diamond. She said the couple, a week away from their wedding, did not press charges.

Leonard yesterday confirmed that case but said he was unable to provide details.


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 03/15/2003 2:33:28 PM PST by Jimmyclyde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jimmyclyde
Why buy milk when you can buy the cow real cheap?
2 posted on 03/15/2003 2:35:27 PM PST by bert (Don't Panic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jimmyclyde
Buy cz in the first place, save the $4200 and then you don't have to worry about your tiny clear hunk of carbon getting stolen.
3 posted on 03/15/2003 2:49:43 PM PST by Hillary's Lovely Legs (If you liked Hitler, you will LOVE Saddam!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jimmyclyde
``I was just shocked,'' said Laura Wagner, who found out in late January that the $4,200 diamond solitaire that she brought to Kenneth's in 1996 to be resized was switched.

And she didn't even notice for 7 years. I will never understand why people throw away their money on something DeBeers tells us that we just must have.

4 posted on 03/15/2003 2:51:54 PM PST by Hillary's Lovely Legs (If you liked Hitler, you will LOVE Saddam!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
So, what got your panties in a wad of this story?

Ladies, who receive as a gift or purchase fine jewelry, have no right to file charges against fraud? They just should have bought the cheap stuff anyway?

Sorry, but conservative Republican ladies should not be ashamed to purchase fine jewelry or nice underwear.

Liberal women wear cotton undies and buy cz's because they are ashamed to have anything nicer than the masses.

If I, as a hard working conservative woman, are the victim of fraud of my jewels...I'm going to have the CEO's family jewels in my hands. LOL



5 posted on 03/15/2003 4:06:44 PM PST by Conservababe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Conservababe
You should put some pics in your profile.
6 posted on 03/15/2003 4:09:46 PM PST by College Repub (http://www.collegehumor.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: College Repub
Why? Do you have an affinity for pics of southern grandmothers wearing their nice jewelry? LOL
7 posted on 03/15/2003 4:17:11 PM PST by Conservababe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jimmyclyde
One of the advantages of "slightly imperfect" diamonds is that not only are they "one of a kind" (to go with a one-of-a-kind sweetie) but fakes are unlikely to share the same imperfections as the original.
8 posted on 03/15/2003 4:17:45 PM PST by supercat (TAG--you're it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservababe
Even if you got the jewels you wanted you would still be the victim of fraud. DeBeers has socked away most of the worlds diamonds keeping them off the market thus keeping the rest artificially inflated.
9 posted on 03/15/2003 4:17:46 PM PST by MigrantOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: supercat
One of the advantages of "slightly imperfect" diamonds is that not only are they "one of a kind" (to go with a one-of-a-kind sweetie) but fakes are unlikely to share the same imperfections as the original.

And your sweetie bought his line? LOL

10 posted on 03/15/2003 4:22:38 PM PST by Conservababe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Conservababe
no. I take that back.
11 posted on 03/15/2003 4:49:57 PM PST by College Repub (http://www.collegehumor.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Conservababe
And your sweetie bought his line? LOL

Meant she got a bigger rock. And even beyond that, I think she liked the way I celebrated my imperfect-but-one-of-a-kind Sweetie.

If I find myself another fiancée, I'd be inclined to do the same thing. Better watch out, though, since if the philosophy gets too wide spread it may push up the prices on H/I1 and H/I2 diamonds [which seem to me to represent an excellent value as diamonds go].

12 posted on 03/15/2003 4:51:00 PM PST by supercat (TAG--you're it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Conservababe
She has every right to file fraud charges and she should.

What's your problem?
13 posted on 03/15/2003 5:08:36 PM PST by Hillary's Lovely Legs (If you liked Hitler, you will LOVE Saddam!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson