Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US military continues to deploy in Turkey, sparking political ire
defense-aerospace ^ | 3/9/03

Posted on 03/09/2003 10:15:15 AM PST by knak

ISTANBUL, March 9 (AFP) - 12:11 GMT - US troops and military equipment continued to deploy through Turkey Sunday en route to its southeastern border with Iraq, triggering accusations that Washington was going beyond the bounds of approved activity to prepare for war with Baghdad.

Two convoys containing US military vehicles and materiel were spotted early Sunday leaving the Iskenderun port on Turkey's Mediterranean coast, Anatolia news agency reported.

A roll-on roll-off ship docked in the port overnight, and television channels broadcast images of its unloading under the cover of nightfall.

"The images that we see on television are extremely disturbing," Turkey's parliament speaker, Bulent Arinc, told the Sunday papers, referring to prior footage of US military moves in the country, whose parliament refused on March 1 to authorize US troop deployments.

"It makes me bristle," he said, calling the activity "de facto" deployment.

Observers have called the accelerated activity a sign of rising expectations that the Turkish parliament will make a second -- and this time successful -- attempt to pass a government motion allowing 62,000 US combat forces to deploy on Turkish soil, in anticipation of opening a northern front against Iraq.

This week, in a significant move, the powerful Turkish army threw its weight behind the US deployment, saying Ankara would otherwise lose both vital US financial aid and any say in shaping post-war Iraq.

Iskenderun is the main sea port from which the United States has been bringing in equipment since early February, when the parliament allowed US personnel to upgrade several Turkish air bases and sea ports ahead of a possible war.

Arinc, a member of the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP), told fellow lawmakers that if, like him, they had "worries" about the movements, they should implement parliamentary "mechanisms of control".

Dogu Perincek, head of the small Labour party (IP) which has no lawmakers in parliament, sent a letter Sunday to President Ahmet Necdet Sezer denouncing the presence of the US military in Turkey, calling it "the beginning of the end of the Turkish state", according to Anatolia.

But the United States, armed with signs of increased support from AKP lawmakers and the key backing from the army, has intensified its military preparations as war with Iraq looms ever larger.

On Friday a convoy of 300 trucks left Iskenderun for Mardin in the southeast, less than 200 kilometers (120 miles) off Iraq's border, where US forces will reportedly set up logistical headquarters if its deployment plans are formally approved.

A spokesman for the US embassy in Ankara denied the convoy was bound for war preparations, telling AFP it was "not combat troops but personnel and military equipment deployed in conformity with the Turkish parliament's decision."

Cumhuriyet newspaper reported Sunday that 700 US soldiers had tried to leave the customs zone of the Iskenderun port a day earlier but had been disarmed and turned back by the Turkish army.

Materiel being unloaded at Iskenderun included military trucks, ambulances, earth-moving machines, containers and mobile bridge parts, NTV television reported.

"The US is keeping up its preparations as if the second vote is guaranteed," Milliyet daily wrote Friday.

The Turkish military build-up also continued in the border region.

Roughly 500 military vehicles -- part of Turkey's largest convoy to be deployed since the 1991 Gulf War -- were stationed near the border town of Habur, and Radikal newspaper reported they would move across the Iraqi border within days.

Access within 15 kilometers of Habur was off-limits to all but military personnel, however, and the vehicles' movements could not be verified.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: warlist

1 posted on 03/09/2003 10:15:15 AM PST by knak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: knak; *war_list; W.O.T.; 11th_VA; Libertarianize the GOP; Free the USA; MadIvan; PhiKapMom; ...
OFFICIAL BUMP(TOPIC)LIST
2 posted on 03/09/2003 10:15:52 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The voices of the 30s are echoing through 2003 - Alistair Cooke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knak
I want the Turkey front, but should we be helping democracy in the Middle East by going along with an army strong-arming a legislature?
3 posted on 03/09/2003 10:18:52 AM PST by 7 x 77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 7 x 77
If the Turkish military feels the leaders are cow towing to islamee interests instead of national interests, they take over. Their version of 'separation of church and state'.
4 posted on 03/09/2003 10:24:06 AM PST by monkeywrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 7 x 77
This would not be happening without the assurance of the Turks. All that remains is the formalities.
5 posted on 03/09/2003 10:26:07 AM PST by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: monkeywrench
It was not the Islamists that voted out the troop movement - it was the lefist. The AKP MPs voted 3 to 1 for the delpoyment.
6 posted on 03/09/2003 10:32:23 AM PST by CasearianDaoist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: knak
Cumhuriyet newspaper reported Sunday that 700 US soldiers had tried to leave the customs zone of the Iskenderun port a day earlier but had been disarmed and turned back by the Turkish army.

Yeah, right.

7 posted on 03/09/2003 10:36:55 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 7 x 77
I don't believe that we are doing this without "someone's" permission.
8 posted on 03/09/2003 10:44:12 AM PST by knak (kelly in alaska)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Can you imagine some poor Iraqi General trying to figure out a battle plan knowing he is totally outmatched and there are so many conflicting reports coming in that he doesn’t have a clue as to what is real and what is misinformation?
9 posted on 03/09/2003 10:46:30 AM PST by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 7 x 77
I want the Turkey front, but should we be helping democracy in the Middle East by going along with an army strong-arming a legislature?

If we don't make use of their assistance now, then we might have to fight them later. The Turks would be expected to make a move on Kurdish territory if the US did not maintain some troops in the area.

10 posted on 03/09/2003 10:46:57 AM PST by kaboom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: knak
You know I bet if Turkey got enough money out of it they could have been pursuaded to publically make it look like they would not allow troops there, while secretly allowing them anyway which would allow for a real surprise attack from the north.. just an idea
11 posted on 03/09/2003 10:51:36 AM PST by junkyarddawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libertarianize the GOP
He has to be confused alright!

I am out of here for several hours!

12 posted on 03/09/2003 11:03:48 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The voices of the 30s are echoing through 2003 - Alistair Cooke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: knak
Fox News just reported that Turkey has a new leader who vows to oust all those who vote against allowing the US to deploy there!
Anybody have any more info?
13 posted on 03/09/2003 11:19:18 AM PST by mollynme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mollynme
Here is a thread on that:

Turkey Has A New Leader

14 posted on 03/09/2003 2:23:37 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The voices of the 30s are echoing through 2003 - Alistair Cooke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Thanks, E_at_the_B.
He's going to oust Cabinet Members that don't tow his line, right?
15 posted on 03/09/2003 3:08:52 PM PST by meema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: meema
Check Foxnews !
16 posted on 03/09/2003 3:17:49 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The voices of the 30s are echoing through 2003 - Alistair Cooke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: knak

Actually...who's doing the counting?

Why not just roll from Turkey with how ever many troops we want. What are they gonna do about it? "You sent 60,000 through here instead of the 5000 we agreed" To which one responds "We did? Oh, sorry about that, we don't agree the number was that big, maybe 5500". The next 20 years they can argue about the number, but after Saddam "Acid Bath" Hussein is gone, who gives a rats rectum.

-Mal

17 posted on 03/09/2003 3:23:44 PM PST by Malsua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
We are unloading equip, which is allowed....it is just that we can't bring troops or actual battle items like tanks in. We can do this even if we do not get a second resolution.
18 posted on 03/09/2003 3:31:49 PM PST by rwfromkansas (Soli Deo Gloria!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson