Skip to comments.
ANOTHER VERY STUPID LAW
Fiedor Report On the News #305 ^
| 3-9-03
| Doug Fiedor
Posted on 03/08/2003 9:59:12 AM PST by forest
A woman was arrested at an airport for "possession" of an illegal substance. That's nothing new; except that this woman did not do anything wrong.
A stupid federal law states that it is illegal to transport prescription drugs out of the container provided by the pharmacist. Never mind that every drug store in the country sells special containers for just that purpose; under federal law, it is a felony.
Compliance with the intent of the law would mean that every person on medication(s) must box up the complete bottles of every medication they will need during every outing. That is foolish, of course. No one does that.
However, because of that stupid law, Congress has made nearly every grandmother and grandfather in the country a lawbreaker almost every time they leave the house for any length of time.
Yet, the Constitution gives no authority for the federal government to regulate drugs of any kind. There is zero authority for Congress to even consider this subject.
Let's tell them to repeal that foolishness.
END
TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: grandparents; illegalsubstance; medication; possession
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
Congress has zero authority to regulate that stuff, yet they get the grandparents hassled.
1
posted on
03/08/2003 9:59:12 AM PST
by
forest
To: forest
Well--this grandparent will have to have another carry on--just for pills--LOL! (If you don't want to take a lot of medicines, don't have a heart attack.)
2
posted on
03/08/2003 10:02:07 AM PST
by
basil
To: forest
"A woman was arrested at an airport for "possession" of an illegal substance."
and the source we have for this is one line at a vanity website ?
3
posted on
03/08/2003 10:04:23 AM PST
by
RS
To: forest
This is not beaking news, why dont yopu just post something obvious as "THIS JUST IN!!! LEMONS TASTE BITTER!!"
To: forest
Is it true that in some towns there are still laws on the books that if you enter the city limits in a "horseless carriage" someone has to walk ahead of you waving a red light, warning people of your impending approach?
5
posted on
03/08/2003 10:06:55 AM PST
by
RobRoy
(More of a green stain, really...)
To: forest
However, because of that stupid law, Congress has made nearly every grandmother and grandfather in the country a lawbreaker almost every time they leave the house for any length of time. How does this guy get from the undoubtedly silly airport law to being a "lawbreaker almost every time they leave the house for any length of time"?
Writing this kind of infantile hyperbole doesn't help the case of the author
6
posted on
03/08/2003 10:10:07 AM PST
by
TomB
(or were they møøse?)
To: forest
So let me get this straight: It's now a Federal no-no to keep your medicine (when you fly) in those weekly/daily pill holders or the like? Who came up with this bird brained regulation??
7
posted on
03/08/2003 10:14:37 AM PST
by
yankeedame
("Oh, I can take it, but I'd much rather dish it out.")
To: forest
This law exists and is abused, by police, fairly often. There is absolutely no need for such a law.
8
posted on
03/08/2003 10:16:55 AM PST
by
Lazamataz
(I have learned, over the years, to NEVER assume ANYTHING..)
To: yankeedame
So let me get this straight: It's now a Federal no-no to keep your medicine (when you fly) in those weekly/daily pill holders or the like?Correct. It is also against some state laws.
9
posted on
03/08/2003 10:17:21 AM PST
by
Lazamataz
(I have learned, over the years, to NEVER assume ANYTHING..)
To: forest; wardaddy; AAABEST
Agree on the insanity upon us with regards to this and other "laws". As to the commercial airline industry they can dry up and go broke for all I care. I refuse to lay out my life and be subjected to the degrading bullsh*t those TSA wannabes dish out by shaking down my personal effects and running backgrounds on me just so I can go from point A to point B.
A goobermint that is willing to blow a commercial plane out of the sky with an air to air missle from a F-16, yet drags their feet on allowing pilots to defend their cockpit with a handgun ,.......IS NOT CONCERNED WITH MY SECURITY !
Stay Safe !
10
posted on
03/08/2003 10:20:04 AM PST
by
Squantos
(Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt.)
To: forest
There is zero authority for Congress to even consider this subject.Well, there is the commerce clause, even though this is a specious and totally inappropriate use of it.
11
posted on
03/08/2003 10:22:00 AM PST
by
inquest
To: TomB
"A stupid federal law states that it is illegal to transport prescription drugs out of the container provided by the pharmacist. Never mind that every drug store in the country sells special containers for just that purpose; under federal law, it is a felony."
That's the quote from the post. I don't read any airline in there. Just what are you talking about?
12
posted on
03/08/2003 10:25:00 AM PST
by
forest
To: forest
There is such a law. I know because I saw recently where someone was charged with having their medication (Xanax)out of the original conainer.
The reason it stuck in my mind is I know a really nice, extremely law abiding (pretty too)little girl who carries Xanax in a 35mm film container because She is a little ashamed that She has to take it occasionally for anxiety. This girl would never knowingly break any law, including speeding. I know because I was riding with her one day and she kept right within the 55 limit the whole way.
13
posted on
03/08/2003 10:25:14 AM PST
by
yarddog
To: RS
"A woman was arrested at an airport for "possession" of an illegal substance."
and the source we have for this is one line at a vanity website ? With the abundant information provided, it's obvious to tell this happened at JFK, involving a senior citizen simply carrying her blood pressure medicine.
There is no link to the actual story, which is how I know it wasn't a 26 year old woman caught in an airport with narcotics (even without the properly labeled container present, it's evident the pills could have only been prescribed to her) stuffed in balloons or condoms she swallowed or shoved up her rear.
How could you possibly need more info (like names, places and facts) about how the author establishes the premise for his article?
14
posted on
03/08/2003 10:26:43 AM PST
by
Gun142
(Where will you be when you get where you're going?)
To: basil
If you don't want to take a lot of medicines, don't have a heart attackYou can say THAT again!
15
posted on
03/08/2003 10:31:39 AM PST
by
Mr_Magoo
To: forest
The connection to the airport is the pill container was found during a search at an airport.
This would be like an no knock search by the homeland securty forces, there finding an expired pain pill your dentist gave you. Against federal law.
You could be kept in jail until the threat to our security was gone. Relax.
16
posted on
03/08/2003 10:35:11 AM PST
by
earplug
To: TomB
How does this guy get from the undoubtedly silly airport law to being a "lawbreaker almost every time they leave the house for any length of time"? It's not an airport law. It applies to everyone, everywhere -- it was just applied at the airport.
His point is that one violates the law by simply distributing your prescription drugs from their original bottles into one of those "7-day" pillboxes and taking it out of your house (transporting them).
To: forest
I don't believe the framers of the constitution gave authority to regulate laser pistols either.. but one day those will be regulated too. They probably didn't think you could put a nuke in a backpack either.. of course I don't think you want people running around with those legally either. Open your eyes to a little moderation libertian friend before you fall over the abyss of insanity.
To: forest
My wife is a transplant recipient. She takes a handful of prescription medicines twice a day. Uses two very large seven-compartment daily pill containers to "load up" and organize a week's worth of her daily dosages at a time. Always carries them with her on trips.
This is so foolish, it's unbelievable, but yet all-too-believable.
19
posted on
03/08/2003 10:43:10 AM PST
by
FreedomPoster
(This Space Intentionally Blank)
To: RS
Not only that, but wouldn't you expect a reference to the U.S. Code in question, or at minimum a snippet of language from the law itself?
20
posted on
03/08/2003 11:01:16 AM PST
by
1rudeboy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson