Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Commentary: The Secret Plan To Thwart Bush (filibuster all of the appellate court nominees)
crosswalk ^ | Gary Bauer

Posted on 03/08/2003 9:07:44 AM PST by TLBSHOW

Commentary: The Secret Plan To Thwart Bush

Washington is buzzing about a recent Robert Novak column that exposed the secret plan developed by Ted Kennedy to block all of President Bush's appellate court nominees.

The current controversy centers around Miguel Estrada, who is being filibustered to death by Senate liberals. (Editor's note: Find out how you can help by clicking here.)

But the plan is much broader and goes back to a secret meeting that took place on January 30th in the office of Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle. At that meeting Daschle, Kennedy and six other Judiciary Committee Democrats endorsed a strategy that will result in filibusters against any conservative nominee.

How serious is the situation? George Will asserted on Friday that if allowed to succeed, this tactic would effectively amend the Constitution by requiring a supermajority to approve judicial nominations. It would put Kennedy, Daschle and Clinton in charge of judges, instead of President Bush.

If Iraq will determine the success of the Bush presidency in foreign affairs, the fight over the federal judiciary in the Senate will determine the success of the Bush presidency domestically. The President and Senate Republican leaders cannot afford to "blink" on this one.

George Will put it more starkly on Friday when he wrote, "And if the president does not wage a fierce, protracted and very public fight for his nominee, he will display insufficient seriousness about the oath he swore to defend the Constitution."

Why Are Judges Important?

The President's ability to appoint conservative judges is important because liberal activists are exercising raw political power to remake America in their image by judicial fiat.

Last week, in fact, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected attempts by the Administration to reconsider the decision banning the Pledge of Allegiance. In a very rare moment, the United States Senate voted unanimously to condemn that ruling.

Yet, nine Democrat senators who live in states under the jurisdiction of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals are supporting the filibuster against Miguel Estrada!


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: democrats; estrada; filibuster; owen; pickering
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

1 posted on 03/08/2003 9:07:44 AM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Kennedy, Daschle and Clinton in charge of judges - and keep them out of jail!
2 posted on 03/08/2003 9:10:42 AM PST by Free_at_last_-2001 (is clinton in jail yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz; Congressman Billybob
THIS IS THE PLAN AND UNTIL FRIST DOES WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE THE SENATE IS IN CONTROL OF THE RATS

FORCE THE DEMOCRATS TO DO THIS IN VIEW OF THE AMERICAN PUBLIC 24 7
3 posted on 03/08/2003 9:18:41 AM PST by TLBSHOW (God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Disagree here...They went after Estrada because if he was confirmed, he'd be up for the SC next, and they couldn't pass him for the Appeals court and oppose him for the SC..but they'll pass the other nominees..Owen, Pickering....it'll give them cover...
4 posted on 03/08/2003 9:19:17 AM PST by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
"George Will asserted on Friday that if allowed to succeed, this tactic would effectively amend the Constitution by requiring a supermajority to approve judicial nominations. It would put Kennedy, Daschle and Clinton in charge of judges, instead of President Bush. "

This is NOT true. A Constitutional amendment does NOT happen in this way or this situation.

5 posted on 03/08/2003 9:24:00 AM PST by nmh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
It is not just judges. The Rats plan is to block EVERYTHING the president proposes and then try to blame him for everything else.
6 posted on 03/08/2003 9:24:41 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
Disagree here...They went after Estrada because if he was confirmed, he'd be up for the SC next, and they couldn't pass him for the Appeals court and oppose him for the SC..but they'll pass the other nominees..Owen, Pickering....it'll give them cover...

Sorry, but thanks for playing.
When the Dumocraps find a tactic that ties up the President's agenda they use it continually so that THEY can show nothing is being done. "It's not our fault he chose Estrada, but we oppose him." So it will go with all of the nominees.
The answer is using the tactics against them.

You want to fillibuster, then move in the cots and warm up the coffee, let's see who has balls in this fight.

Oh wait, we're talking Senate Republicans.

7 posted on 03/08/2003 9:25:32 AM PST by Pistolshot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nmh
Will is referring to a de facto, not de jure, amendment.

He's right.
8 posted on 03/08/2003 9:26:06 AM PST by Keith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
No they won't pass on them they will filibuster them. Mark my words the rats are going to do this to Owen and Pickering too and every single one they don't want.
9 posted on 03/08/2003 9:31:31 AM PST by TLBSHOW (God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pistolshot; TLBSHOW
They'll oppose, Pickering, Owens, et al, but they won't filiabuster them...Estrada had to be stopped, because he's likely Bush's first nominee to the SC..the others aren't that big a deal to them.... I think that's why W. sent Estrada up first..he knew the Dems would fight it..and thus, in a way he makes it easier for the others....
10 posted on 03/08/2003 9:35:53 AM PST by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Unbelievable leftist scum bags. ENOUGH is ENOUGH!!!They will pay when they lose the WH and all chances of any majorities as they are exposed. Let them continue their garbage, they are now on the TV saying they want to take back-- congress, allowing war-on terrorisim.

When we go in and take Saddam and OBL and crush all the terrorist cells Clinton sat on his ass allowing while making domestic fluffy enviro leftist, fake caring of black people and the economy look good (with the dot.comers (and INVENTION? of the internet) allowing him in that era to have a strong-looking economy)

Clinton sat on his ass getting blow jobs in the oval office selling us out to China- and this President is stuck cleaning it all up and they dare block his every move-they will pay when they are all voted out and can't count pregnant chads and falsely claim black people were turned away from polls, to try to steal an election- sending in fake Jesse Jackson.

Clinton was making fluffy promises/deals w/ N. Korea, screwing us in the long run all awhile jacking off and attacking American militias and creating black churches being burnt and having innocent Elian taken at gun point, and school shootings to take our guns. And then he had the freaking audacity to invite red china to OUR WH and hang their commie flag and force our marines to stand attention to communisim and toast with champagne! Muchless his selling off the Lincoln bedroom to pay all of his rapist, legal expenses becaue he lied and it depends on the definition of IT or IS!

So now we try to clean up his white trash garbage and foreign relation atrocities while he sat in his underwear getting blown and his leftists commie demokratic party dares to stop us? He blew up and aspirin factory and bombed the Chinese Embassy and then blamed bad blueprinting and our military? (all to cover his selling us out TO China) And or China was going to re nig on one of the secrets echanges and not fill he and Hitlery's swiss acct. so he blew up their embassy like the dixie mob scum he is.

And then when we are at the bring of two theaters of serious war he does a freaking talk show and he and Carter bash the President. Hitlery only told off Sheen as she is running in 06 and is a lying,evil,corrupt witch that will stop at nothing to be President with Bill as the U.N. Koffi blow job leader.

These leftists have audacity and they are being exposed-more every second until then we will pay with events like 9/11. What did Clinton do when the towers were bombed, he went and bombed aspirin factories and then tapped our oil reserves so to not piss off Americans with high gas prices.What did he do when the U.S.S. Cole was attacked?NOTHING! I have had it with these people.

11 posted on 03/08/2003 9:44:13 AM PST by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
I wish you were right, but I don't think you are. This below from a rat about Estrada just take out Estradas name and put in either Owen or Pickering.
..

"This is no game we're playing," said the Senate's second-ranking Democrat, Nevada's Harry Reid. "This is a filibuster. We have a right to do that."


http://www.aberdeennews.com/mld/aberdeennews/news/5162330.htm
12 posted on 03/08/2003 9:46:35 AM PST by TLBSHOW (God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Keith
Will is referring to a de facto, not de jure, amendment. He's right.",br>

No, he is very wrong.

When it comes to pouty Gray Bauer I won't trust much of anything he says. Way back when he ran for President. He got all pissed off when he didn't win and endorsed pro abortinist John McCain. Sorry but Gary Bauer was wrong then and wrong now. He really needs to understand what is required for a Constitutional amendment and not resort to insane scare tactics for attention.

13 posted on 03/08/2003 9:50:24 AM PST by nmh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
Not to worry. Let the rats stop all judicial nominations. Two can play that game. We will stop all nominations of democrats administrations. The last judge standing should be Justice Thomas. He is 9 years younger than the next youngest justice. Can you imagine the howling that would take place by the rats, if we had a one man supreme judiciary and that man was Thomas.
14 posted on 03/08/2003 9:55:49 AM PST by brydic1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
I got two words for ya...Recess Appointments. The Dems stalling and obstructing we be laid bare for all to see and Bush can then recess appoint the judges he wants without much political fallout.
15 posted on 03/08/2003 9:58:10 AM PST by SCHROLL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
democrats plan to filibuster bush judges


http://news.google.com/news?q=democrats+plan+to+filibuster+bush+judges&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&safe=off&start=0&sa=N
16 posted on 03/08/2003 10:00:47 AM PST by TLBSHOW (God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SCHROLL
Is it possible for Bush to do this?

A wonderful tactic... :)

17 posted on 03/08/2003 10:09:12 AM PST by Reactionary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Why Are Judges Important? The President's ability to appoint conservative judges is important because liberal activists are exercising raw political power to remake America in their image by judicial fiat. Last week, in fact, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected attempts by the Administration to reconsider the decision banning the Pledge of Allegiance. In a very rare moment, the United States Senate voted unanimously to condemn that ruling. Yet, nine Democrat senators who live in states under the jurisdiction of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals are supporting the filibuster against Miguel Estrada!

Besides killing dem senators in states with rep govs can anyone think of what we can do to help(phone calls don't seem to help, I'm in Ca)

18 posted on 03/08/2003 10:45:07 AM PST by Mister Baredog ((God Bless GW Bush))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reactionary
Recess appointments are only temporary and last for only a year.
19 posted on 03/08/2003 10:52:20 AM PST by brydic1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Mister Baredog
To make sure that the west wing and Frist knows that we want them to force the democrats to into a 24 7 filibuster. That we want the Republicans to talk nothing but this all over the country about just what the democrats are doing.

Call the white House and First 24 7 and demand them to do this.
20 posted on 03/08/2003 10:57:14 AM PST by TLBSHOW (God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson