Posted on 03/04/2003 12:16:38 PM PST by RCW2001
It would be a "shame" if French President Jacques Chirac identified the United States as an adversary for the sake of European unity, an adviser to the US Defense Department said in remarks broadcast Tuesday.
"Unfortunately, I think that President Chirac conceives of Europe as a counterweight to the United States," Richard Perle, chairman of the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board, told France-Inter radio.
Chirac has been a leading critic of quick US-led military action against Iraq, arguing that more time is needed for UN inspectors to find and destroy Baghdad's weapons of mass destruction.
Some have accused Chirac of taking a high-profile stance on Iraq to bolster France's standing in the 15-member European Union.
Perle, whose board advises Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld on policy issues, said that Washington has been accustomed to a France that is more an ally than a counterweight.
"It's possible to be a friendly counterweight," he said, according to the radio station's French translation of his comments. "But we'll have to see how far he wants to take this concept."
"It would be a great shame if the French president thinks that he needs to identify the United States as an opponent to construct the European Union," Perle said in the interview, conducted in Washington.
Perle also reiterated that United Nations resolution 1441, passed last year to push for Iraqi disarmament, may be enough to justify military action against Iraq. Washington is promoting a second UN resolution that would authorize force against Baghdad.
However, the French Foreign Ministry said Tuesday it believes that the majority of the 15 UN Security Council members who must vote on any resolution favor the stance taken by Paris.
"We still think a large majority is favorable to the pursuit of inspections and their reinforcement," said Foreign Ministry spokesman Francois Rivasseau.
A French diplomatic source said France believes it has 10, perhaps 11, nations with it, more than enough negative votes to block a second resolution. The source asked not to be further identified.
"If there is no new resolution, then the last resolution is the one that prevails, and we can interpret that to mean what it says: there will be serious consequences," he said.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.