Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Revealed: US dirty tricks to win vote on Iraq war
The Observer (U.K.) ^ | 03/02/03 | Martin Bright, Ed Vulliamy, and Peter Beaumont

Posted on 03/01/2003 4:29:27 PM PST by Pokey78

Secret document details American plan to bug phones and emails of key Security Council members

The United States is conducting a secret 'dirty tricks' campaign against UN Security Council delegations in New York as part of its battle to win votes in favour of war against Iraq.

Details of the aggressive surveillance operation, which involves interception of the home and office telephones and the emails of UN delegates in New York, are revealed in a document leaked to The Observer.

The disclosures were made in a memorandum written by a top official at the National Security Agency - the US body which intercepts communications around the world - and circulated to both senior agents in his organisation and to a friendly foreign intelligence agency asking for its input.

The memo describes orders to staff at the agency, whose work is clouded in secrecy, to step up its surveillance operations 'particularly directed at... UN Security Council Members (minus US and GBR, of course)' to provide up-to-the-minute intelligence for Bush officials on the voting intentions of UN members regarding the issue of Iraq.

The leaked memorandum makes clear that the target of the heightened surveillance efforts are the delegations from Angola, Cameroon, Chile, Mexico, Guinea and Pakistan at the UN headquarters in New York - the so-called 'Middle Six' delegations whose votes are being fought over by the pro-war party, led by the US and Britain, and the party arguing for more time for UN inspections, led by France, China and Russia.

The memo is directed at senior NSA officials and advises them that the agency is 'mounting a surge' aimed at gleaning information not only on how delegations on the Security Council will vote on any second resolution on Iraq, but also 'policies', 'negotiating positions', 'alliances' and 'dependencies' - the 'whole gamut of information that could give US policymakers an edge in obtaining results favourable to US goals or to head off surprises'.

Dated 31 January 2003, the memo was circulated four days after the UN's chief weapons inspector Hans Blix produced his interim report on Iraqi compliance with UN resolution 1441.

It was sent by Frank Koza, chief of staff in the 'Regional Targets' section of the NSA, which spies on countries that are viewed as strategically important for United States interests.

Koza specifies that the information will be used for the US's 'QRC' - Quick Response Capability - 'against' the key delegations.

Suggesting the levels of surveillance of both the office and home phones of UN delegation members, Koza also asks regional managers to make sure that their staff also 'pay attention to existing non-UN Security Council Member UN-related and domestic comms [office and home telephones] for anything useful related to Security Council deliberations'.

Koza also addresses himself to the foreign agency, saying: 'We'd appreciate your support in getting the word to your analysts who might have similar more indirect access to valuable information from accesses in your product lines [ie, intelligence sources].' Koza makes clear it is an informal request at this juncture, but adds: 'I suspect that you'll be hearing more along these lines in formal channels.'

Disclosure of the US operation comes in the week that Blix will make what many expect to be his final report to the Security Council.

It also comes amid increasingly threatening noises from the US towards undecided countries on the Security Council who have been warned of the unpleasant economic consequences of standing up to the US.

Sources in Washington familiar with the operation said last week that there had been a division among Bush administration officials over whether to pursue such a high-intensity surveillance campaign with some warning of the serious consequences of discovery.

The existence of the surveillance operation, understood to have been requested by President Bush's National Security Adviser, Condoleezza Rice, is deeply embarrassing to the Americans in the middle of their efforts to win over the undecided delegations.

The language and content of the memo were judged to be authentic by three former intelligence operatives shown it by The Observer. We were also able to establish that Frank Koza does work for the NSA and could confirm his senior post in the Regional Targets section of the organisation.

The NSA main switchboard put The Observer through to extension 6727 at the agency which was answered by an assistant, who confirmed it was Koza's office. However, when The Observer asked to talk to Koza about the surveillance of diplomatic missions at the United Nations, it was then told 'You have reached the wrong number'.

On protesting that the assistant had just said this was Koza's extension, the assistant repeated that it was an erroneous extension, and hung up.

While many diplomats at the UN assume they are being bugged, the memo reveals for the first time the scope and scale of US communications intercepts targeted against the New York-based missions.

The disclosure comes at a time when diplomats from the countries have been complaining about the outright 'hostility' of US tactics in recent days to persuade then to fall in line, including threats to economic and aid packages.

The operation appears to have been spotted by rival organisations in Europe. 'The Americans are being very purposeful about this,' said a source at a European intelligence agency when asked about the US surveillance efforts.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bushdoctrineunfold; espionagelist; hoax; hoaxes; mediabias; myth; myths; unlist; warlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-122 next last
To: Pokey78
And so?...
81 posted on 03/01/2003 6:48:44 PM PST by Godfollow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
From the Drudge Report, here is what it pointed out:
The alleged 'top secret' text of NSA email...
BUT WAIT: WOULD AMERICAN NSA EMPLOYEE SPELL FAVORABLE 'FAVOURABLE', RECOGNIZE 'RECOGNISE' AND EMPHASIZE 'EMPHASISE' IN A BRITISH TONGUE?...
WOULD NSA REALLY TIME STAMP EMAILS '31/01/2003 0:16' IN EUROPEAN FORMAT?...
NAME IN ALLEGED EMAIL IS 'KOZU' AND OBSERVER STORY CLAIMS TO HAVE CONTACTED A 'KOZA'?...

Its in British Tongue.
82 posted on 03/01/2003 6:53:37 PM PST by Veritas01 (Veritas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
From the Drudge Report, here is what it pointed out:
The alleged 'top secret' text of NSA email...
BUT WAIT: WOULD AMERICAN NSA EMPLOYEE SPELL FAVORABLE 'FAVOURABLE', RECOGNIZE 'RECOGNISE' AND EMPHASIZE 'EMPHASISE' IN A BRITISH TONGUE?...
WOULD NSA REALLY TIME STAMP EMAILS '31/01/2003 0:16' IN EUROPEAN FORMAT?...
NAME IN ALLEGED EMAIL IS 'KOZU' AND OBSERVER STORY CLAIMS TO HAVE CONTACTED A 'KOZA'?...

Its in British Tongue.
83 posted on 03/01/2003 6:54:53 PM PST by Veritas01 (Veritas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan is King
Plus the guy misspelled his own name. Is it Kuza or Kuzu??
84 posted on 03/01/2003 7:07:51 PM PST by TenthAmendmentChampion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead
Old finale to a fiddler's tune: "Anywhere, and I don't care; park your lady in an easy chair." Well, with the UN. anywhere and I don't care; park the fartheads somewhere over there."
85 posted on 03/01/2003 7:21:17 PM PST by mathurine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TenthAmendmentChampion
Hats off to those that caught the spelling and usage problems, even before Drudge, who now calls it "A Smear".

All the erec*ions and mois*ness are fading fast at DU.

Doubt sets in.
86 posted on 03/01/2003 7:22:05 PM PST by CaptSkip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Patriot1998
patriot,

Please refrain from posting items that would make others in this forum to think you are an idot.

This 'email' is obvouusly a hoax.
87 posted on 03/01/2003 7:29:42 PM PST by jbstrick (Behold the Power of CHEESE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
The story is only three hours old and is already starting to fall apart.

The hoax is being dispelled as Drudge is inundated with emails, many from Freepers, pointing out the obvious.

Go getum Freepers!

88 posted on 03/01/2003 7:37:27 PM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Are we witnessing the stage being set for the next world war? Between the Middle East, North Korea, the deepening divisions between us and traditional "allies"...what comes next?
89 posted on 03/01/2003 7:49:40 PM PST by ConservativeConvert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Yes, that new Patriot Act against terrorists sure comes in handy ;)
90 posted on 03/01/2003 7:58:52 PM PST by Libertina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead
Brussels? I'd say Paris, but that place is so depraved, a lot of them would enjoy it.
91 posted on 03/01/2003 8:03:45 PM PST by 185JHP ( Brisance. Puissance. Resolve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag
The chat shows should have fun with this one tomorrow!
92 posted on 03/01/2003 8:27:31 PM PST by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
This e-mail is a red herring, a fake and preposterous on its face.

Let some com-symp try to site its authenticity as "proof" of US dirty tricks and watch them get laughed out of the room.

The dupes and propagandists at the "Observer" are going to have to do better than this.

93 posted on 03/01/2003 8:41:22 PM PST by Rome2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: knak
The world will believe this but can't believe for a second that Saddam has people watching the inspectors.

Exactly. For the next few days, it will just possibly be accepted that this was an obvious forgery. After that, for the next 30 years, all over the internet (except here), people will be posting how it is proven that the US bugs the UN.

94 posted on 03/01/2003 8:43:28 PM PST by Steve Eisenberg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000
The DUers already have Bush impeached over this.
95 posted on 03/01/2003 8:44:10 PM PST by harry palmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Well there are two Frank Koza's in the area of D.C., one in Virginia, one in Maryland. So why doesn't someone call Frank and ask him what is up with the Memo. I feel like it is a fraud.
96 posted on 03/01/2003 8:53:19 PM PST by jjhunsecker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Works for me.
97 posted on 03/01/2003 8:53:51 PM PST by Let's Roll (Whether we bring our enemies to justice, or bring justice to our enemies, justice will be done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
I thought only the Guardian would be dumb enough to fall for this. I now realize my error. The Internet is mainly a vehicle for transmitting & magnifying stupidity.

Can't wait to see what Mark Steyn has to say about this.

98 posted on 03/01/2003 8:58:00 PM PST by redbaiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Starboard
As you've likely heard by now, the Agency is mounting a surge particularly directed at the UN Security Council (UNSC) members (minus US and GBR of course)

This phraseology is totally bogus.

Laughably so. And isn't this usage of 'surge' British? ( along with the '-ise' endings cited by another contributor ) ... not that I know anything about it, but sheesh.

"As you've likely heard by now" ... now that's funny.

Here's another secret communication I intercepted:

"Request all ops acknowledge visual acquistion under crepuscular viewing conditions of target last observed in dark phase transition. Note macroscopic striations and luminous stellations of said target intermittently visible under conditions of belligerent engagement due to transient optical emission of incendiary devices. Morale considerably enhanced. Vital to determine persistence of target emblematic of regional habitation by intrepid and unconstrained individuals. - Reply code only"

99 posted on 03/01/2003 9:00:55 PM PST by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: harry palmer
already have Bush impeached over this.

Stupid is as stupid does.

If the rats are so smart, why are they out of power?

100 posted on 03/01/2003 9:28:19 PM PST by Rome2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-122 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson