Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kyl says military action is near, blames Clinton for passing buck. (At least one Sen has it Right!)
Sierra Vista Herald, Sierra Vista Arizona ^ | Sunday, February 23, 2003 | BILL HESS

Posted on 02/23/2003 9:00:09 AM PST by SandRat

Arizona Senator John Kyl visits Sierra Vista on Friday night at the Windemere Hotel as a guest speaker for the Lincoln Day Dinner sponsored by the Cochise County Republican Committee. (Ed Honda-Herald/Review)

SIERRA VISTA -- It is not a matter of if the United States will attack Iraq but when, Republican U.S. Sen. Jon Kyl said Friday night.

"We will be involved in military action in a matter of days or a few weeks," he told nearly 250 people who attended the annual Lincoln Day Dinner sponsored by the Cochise County Republican Committee.

What people do not understand is that the Persian Gulf War in the early 1990s ended with an armistice, "and we are technically still in a state of war with Iraq," the senator said.

Some of the current problems concerning Iraq and its leader Saddam Hussein can be put at the door of the administration of Democratic President Bill Clinton, Kyl said.

The Clinton administration kicked the can down the road hoping some day someone else would take care of the problem, the senator said.

As for a lack of support from some in the United Nations and NATO, he called them feckless countries, that are weak and irresponsible.

"If the United Nations wants to cut and run and if our allies want to cut and run, OK. We're going to rid the world of Saddam Hussein," Kyl said. "That will happen."

Applause rose from the audience when he made the comments that Saddam's days are numbered.

But the United States will not go to war alone, for there will be support from many nations.

Kyl was disdainful of France saying that nation has "confirmed its irrelevancy" by not supporting the United States over Iraq.

"Neither France nor the United Nations are relevant," the senator said.

When asked if the United States can direct U.N. inspectors to where weapons of mass destruction are being hidden in Iraq, Kyl responded, "Our intelligence isn't that good."

But there is no doubt in his mind about Iraq having chemical and biological weapons based on that nation's past history of using such devices.

What concerns the senator is that the Iraqi leader will use them against American and other forces during the coming war and will also turn them over to terrorist groups to be used against the United States.

Because Iraq also is trying to develop nuclear weapons that makes that country even more dangerous, Kyl said.

He then spoke about how the United States is handling the problem with North Korea, a country that has nuclear weapons.

The United States can use military power against Iraq, but it is too late to do the same thing against North Korea because that country has nuclear weapons, the senator said.

Taking care of the North Korean problem will require strong international diplomacy, he added.

While some may think the United States has forgotten about Osama bin Laden, the accused mastermind of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in the United States, Kyl said the man is still being sought.

One difficulty is that it is believed bin Laden is hiding in a border area between Pakistan and Afghanistan -- a wild tribal area where Pakistan has no control, Kyl said.

United States and Pakistan officials are working to be able to enter the area controlled by tribal groups that do not recognize Pakistani authority, the senator said.

Terrorism remains a major concern for the United States and that means ensuring the nation's borders are protected, Kyl said.

Ensuring the nation is as safe as it can be from terrorist attacks means the federal government has to do more to secure the borders, he said.

The senator was asked if military forces can be put along the border.

"Not at this time," he said, explaining that with the need for military forces to handle problems elsewhere in the world, they cannot take on additional duties.

However, he held out the possibility that armed forces could be used in the future, noting that in some cases National Guard and active duty forces are providing support along the border. The comment elicited applause.

"This county does not have the will to enforce its own laws when it comes to immigration," the senator said.

The laws include going after employers who willingly hire illegal immigrants, Kyl said to applause.

He said he could support a new guest-worker program but only if it has strong enforcement rules that will be used by the government.

Earlier, Kyl introduced Republican U.S. Rep. Tom Tancredo of Colorado.

Tancredo, who is the chairman of the Congressional Immigration Reform Caucus, was spending a few days in Arizona, including some time in Cochise County, to obtain firsthand knowledge of the state's border problems.

Of Tancredo, Kyl said, "He's an Arizona kind of guy. He tells it like it is and he says what he means and means what he says."

It is people like Tancredo who will help solve the nation's immigration problems by educating other members of Congress to understand the issues, Kyl said, adding "He will speak with firsthand knowledge."

Since the dinner was a partisan event, Kyl started out noting Abraham Lincoln was the founder of the modern Republican party.

"He (Lincoln) was a very political person, a precinct chairman, a local candidate. He understood grassroots politics," the senator said.

Kyl attacked Democrats of today, especially those in the U.S. Senate, saying they are out of tune with the American public.

The Democrats in the Senate are making errors that will lead to an even bigger defeat for that party in the 2004 elections, including the presidential race, the senator said.

As for party politics in Arizona, Kyl said that even though the top leader of Arizona is a Democrat -- Gov. Janet Napolitano -- the Republicans will be successful in stopping her from fiscally ruining the state.

Kyl noted that the local party faithfully "turned this Democratic county (Cochise County) into a Republican stronghold."


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: bush; clinton; france; germany; iraq; nato; powell; president; saddamhussein; senator; un; unitedstates; unittednations; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
Sorry but it's just a little long.
1 posted on 02/23/2003 9:00:09 AM PST by SandRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SandRat
The Clinton administration kicked the can down the road hoping some day someone else would take care of the problem, the senator said.

Finally someone in a position of power is starting to speak up about the worst president this country ever had.

2 posted on 02/23/2003 9:35:01 AM PST by texasbluebell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
Kyl is right. Military action is near. Got some news today that confirms it.
3 posted on 02/23/2003 9:40:58 AM PST by rintense (Go Get 'Em Dubya!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
Link to interview with Clinton from the The Atlantic this month.

I'm neither fish nor fowl. That is, I believe that he [Saddam Hussein] is very bad. We have a lot to answer for, and he is basically partly our creature. I'm not criticizing President Bush on this because I did the same thing. I've sat there and pontificated about how [Saddam] is the only guy to use chemical weapons on his own people.

Loads more at the article he pretty much backs Bush on this.

4 posted on 02/23/2003 9:54:14 AM PST by chance33_98 (Freep On)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
"What people do not understand is that the Persian Gulf War in the early 1990s ended with an armistice, "and we are technically still in a state of war with Iraq," the senator said. "

I've been wondering why no one else has been saying this. You often hear lefties talking about "the peace treaty" we had with Iraq following their expulsion from Kuwait. They are never called on that. I tried to make Kyl's point last semester in my international law class and was villified.

5 posted on 02/23/2003 10:05:03 AM PST by Cosmo (Fight Big Duct Tape)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cosmo
I've been wondering why no one else has been saying this. You often hear lefties talking about "the peace treaty" we had with Iraq following their expulsion from Kuwait. They are never called on that. I tried to make Kyl's point last semester in my international law class and was villified.

In an obtuse way Clinton discusses that in the previously linked article.

6 posted on 02/23/2003 10:06:51 AM PST by chance33_98 (Freep On)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
"I'm not criticizing President Bush on this because I did the same thing. I've sat there and pontificated about how [Saddam] is the only guy to use chemical weapons on his own people." -- bilyblythe Clinton

Watch the vicious treasonist run to catch the Bush train...Run, billy! Run!

...and then there's his, "I did the same thing...pontificated..." PONTIFICATED??? ha...He's not running fast enough...well, not regarding anything moral. Billy runs PLENTY fast when he's running away from responsibility.

billyblythe clinton LOATHES THE MILITARY: I loathe billyblythe clinton.

7 posted on 02/23/2003 10:22:44 AM PST by bannie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rintense
Got some news today that confirms it.

Yes..............

8 posted on 02/23/2003 10:46:07 AM PST by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: texasbluebell
Finally someone in a position of power is starting to speak up about the worst president this country ever had. - you read my mind!
9 posted on 02/23/2003 10:51:38 AM PST by Free_at_last_-2001 (is clinton in jail yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
When asked if the United States can direct U.N. inspectors to where weapons of mass destruction are being hidden in Iraq, Kyl responded, "Our intelligence isn't that good."

He's being kind. What little intelligence we have about weapons location we would be wise to keep to ourselves, so we can take them out when we strike. If we told the UN, they would tell Saddam, and the weapons would be moved.

10 posted on 02/23/2003 11:06:44 AM PST by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rintense
If the German newspaper report is accurate that Iraq has moved 200-kilometer-range missiles close to the Kuwaiti border, then those weapons pose a clear and present danger to U.S. forces in the area. With what kind of warhead should we suppose those missiles to be armed?

Can there be any doubt that, regardless of what the dithering United Nations does or does not resolve to do, Bush has a constitutional duty right now as Commander-in-Chief to order the preemptive use of all necessary force to protect American forces from this imminent danger?
11 posted on 02/23/2003 11:16:04 AM PST by We Happy Few ("we band of brothers; for he to-day that sheds his blood with me shall be my brother;")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
The Clinton administration kicked the can down the road hoping some day someone else would take care of the problem, the senator said.

Include the Clinton recession, Clintons failing indoctrination schools, massive unchecked immigration, arming China with long range missiles, aiding Koreas military, ignoring terrorists killing Americans all through the '90's, aiding the spread of homosexual plagues, .......
Welcome to the Clinton legacy of death and desolation. So don't be shy. Make sure everyone is aware of it.

12 posted on 02/23/2003 11:31:24 AM PST by concerned about politics (Stop Taxpayer Supported Socialist Indoctrinatin... Support School Choice ..Demand it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: We Happy Few
Those those missiles should be destroyed then.

Deployment of the missiles, which have a range of 200 kilometers (125 miles), violates of UN resolution 949, which was passed in October 1994 and which ordered Iraq not to threaten its neighbors.

UN resolutions impose a 150-kilometre (93-mile) limit on the range of Iraqi ballistic missiles.


Go Senator Kyl BTW.....
13 posted on 02/23/2003 12:20:03 PM PST by Rain-maker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
Clinton is a political venereal disease. It just won't go away.
14 posted on 02/23/2003 12:32:06 PM PST by Siobhan (+Pray the Divine Mercy Chaplet+)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cosmo
"International law." Now that is a joke.
15 posted on 02/23/2003 12:36:20 PM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
Kyl and Hayworth represent Arizona. The others are just RINOs or liberals.
16 posted on 02/23/2003 3:21:06 PM PST by Don Corleone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
No Kidding. I've never been so frustrated by a class in my life.
17 posted on 02/23/2003 3:59:26 PM PST by Cosmo (Fight Big Duct Tape)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone
Kyl and Hayworth represent Arizona. The others are just RINOs or liberals.

You are right about McCain, Kolbe, Pastor, and Grijalva.

Beyond that you are wrong, J.D.'s voting record is sad, moderate at best. Jeff Flake has the best voting record in the House, John Shadegg's is nearly as good, I don't know much about Rick Renzi, Trent Franks will be right up there with Jeff Flake, and Ron Paul.

18 posted on 02/23/2003 4:07:52 PM PST by c-b 1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
Re: The Clinton administration kicked the can down the road hoping some day someone else would take care of the problem, the senator said.

Naw! Bill just kept screwing around until he lost taack of time.

19 posted on 02/23/2003 4:09:52 PM PST by sonofatpatcher2 (Love & a .45-- What more could you want, campers? };^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cosmo
Unless the prof is an idiot, he should have made the point that the term "law" as used in international relations is not the right term. Just because th judges wear robes and are professional jurists doesn't make their panels law courts.
20 posted on 02/23/2003 4:56:46 PM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson