Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Government Hits $6.4 Trillion Debt Limit
Business - AP ^ | Thu Feb 20, 4:26 AM ET | By MARTIN CRUTSINGER, AP Economics Writer

Posted on 02/20/2003 5:09:09 AM PST by A Vast RightWing Conspirator

Business - AP
Government Hits $6.4 Trillion Debt Limit
Thu Feb 20, 4:26 AM ET
Add Business - AP to My Yahoo!

By MARTIN CRUTSINGER, AP Economics Writer

WASHINGTON - Replaying a drama from last year, the government is once again bumping against the debt limit of $6.4 trillion and the Treasury Department (news - web sites) has begun taking evasive actions to prevent an unprecedented default on the national debt.


Special Coverage
Latest news:
Inspectors Visit Iraq Missile Factories
AP - 9 minutes ago
U.S., Britain Prepare Iraq Resolution
AP - 31 minutes ago
Bush Demands Reply From Turkey on Aid
AP - 2 hours, 33 minutes ago
Special Coverage

 

Treasury Secretary John Snow informed leaders of Congress on Wednesday that the government would reach the borrowing limit on Thursday and he would begin pulling investments out of a $48 billion government pension fund to make room for normal public borrowing auctions.

In a reference to the looming possibility of a war with Iraq, Snow urged Congress to act without delay to raise the borrowing limit.

"I know that you share the president's and my commitment to maintaining the full faith and credit of the U.S. government, especially at this critical time," Snow said in his letter.

"Together we must continue working to enact an increase in the statutory debt limit as quickly as possible to avoid any negative repercussions at home or abroad," Snow said.

The drama was similar to one that unfolded last year as Congress finally raised the debt ceiling from $5.95 trillion to the current limit of $6.4 trillion on June 28, but only after months of debate and brinksmanship with then-Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill having to resort to ever-more elaborate procedures to shift funds in order to clear room for necessary borrowing.

Republicans will push to approve the Bush administration's request for a higher debt limit, citing the need to protect the country's excellent credit rating. U.S. Treasury securities are considered the safest investment in the world because the government has always met its obligations.

But Democrats are certain to use that request as a chance to criticize President Bush (news - web sites)'s tax cut policies, which they contend have led to record budget deficits and the need for a higher debt limit.

Snow said the administration would begin making room for normal borrowing Thursday by not fully investing in the Government Securities Investment Fund, often called the G-fund. This fund, which totals $48 billion, is used by the government to credit earnings for federal employees' pensions.

Snow stressed in the letter that any investments taken out of the G-fund to make room for other government borrowing would be replaced with interest earnings once Congress passes a new debt ceiling. Congress currently is in a weeklong recess.

(Story continues after advertisement)

ADVERTISEMENT

The government can take similar actions with other government funds and there is a possibility it could make it to April 15 when a flood of tax payments will bolster government coffers.

Last year, the administration sought an increase of $750 billion in the debt ceiling, hoping to avoid a second battle so soon in the new Congress. However, Democrats in the Senate successfully blocked that effort and the actual amount approved was a much smaller $450 billion.

This time, Brian Roseboro, Treasury's assistant secretary for financial management, said the administration is not asking for a specific amount, leaving that decision up to Congress.

In testimony last week, Federal Reserve (news - web sites) Chairman Alan Greenspan (news - web sites) said Congress should consider doing away with the debt limit, saying it "has never in my judgment been successful in doing what it is supposed to have been doing, namely constrain spending."

Roseboro said the administration agreed with that sentiment, citing a comment made by O'Neill last year when he called the debt ceiling "an abomination."

While the debate over the debt limit often grows intense, as a practical matter Congress would be very unlikely to allow government finances to reach a point where there would be the possibility of an actual default on any part of the national debt, given the effect that would have on the government's credit rating and future interest levels it would have to pay on its substantial debt.

The national debt subject to limit stood at $6.392 trillion as of Tuesday, just $8 billion shy of the $6.4 trillion limit.

___

On the Net: http://www.treasury.gov/press/releases/reports/debtlimitlettertocongress.pdf

Snow's letter to Congress:



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS:
Not a problem. Let's blame it on Clinton.

I saw a little article on Drudge yesterday. Apparently, the Fed's spending went up by 21% over the past 2 years, the biggest rate of increase since the 70's. And it wasn't because of the military. The defense expenditure went up by some 22% but the non-defense were up by 21% too.

1 posted on 02/20/2003 5:09:09 AM PST by A Vast RightWing Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: A Vast RightWing Conspirator
This is my hot button. Where are the spending cuts? Who's going to buy this debt at current bond rates? What a ponzi scheme.
2 posted on 02/20/2003 5:10:37 AM PST by Glenn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Glenn
I suppose the current 'budgeteers' were trained with 'creative math':

cut taxes (great, make the conservatives happy) + spend more (get more votes too) = ?????

The 6.4 trillion, if divided equally amongst all, let's say almost 300,000,000 Americans would produce a $21,000 debt burden per person - this includes new-born babies. This would mean about $106,000.00 for my soon-to-become family of 5. But, since the burden is not distributed equally, I would say my family's burden must be more like $200-300,000. This would be more doubling than my current mortgage.
3 posted on 02/20/2003 5:22:31 AM PST by A Vast RightWing Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Glenn
EXACTLY! Right now, cutting defense spending would be absolutley stupid, but there is so much room in pretty much every other aspect of the budget to cut that we shouldn't be in this predicament.

I still believe the Federal government should be under the same fiscal restraints as many states - Ballanced budget is required.

As long as the federal government is in the business of being the "nanny" for all the destitute, slugs, illegal immigrants, wack-o's, etc., then the government spending will be out of control.

Combine this with the billions of dollars in stupid pork on you see how we wind up in such situations.

Even worse, the Republicans still pander to the DemocRATS and give them huge chunks of what they want (almost always social spending that we can't afford). Of c ourse both sides are guilty of the pork I refered to above.

If this continues, I forcast the same ugly words to come out of Washington that are coming out of LIttle Rock regarding our state budget - Tax increases.
4 posted on 02/20/2003 5:26:44 AM PST by TheBattman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Glenn
This is my hot button. Where are the spending cuts? Who's going to buy this debt at current bond rates? What a ponzi scheme.

Agreed. If there ever was a time for a President to stand up and say our priority has to be defeating terrorism - and that means substituting "guns for butter" - this is it. A case could easily be made for cutting domestic spending.

5 posted on 02/20/2003 5:31:42 AM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson