Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SADDAM'S CHEM PLOT REVEALED
New York Post ^ | 2/19/03 | NILES LATHEM

Posted on 02/19/2003 12:30:16 AM PST by kattracks

Edited on 05/26/2004 5:12:12 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

February 19, 2003 -- WASHINGTON - Saddam Hussein plans to use chemical weapons to create a ring of death around Baghdad to slow down a U.S. invasion and turn the city's residents into hostages, a former Iraqi scientist said yesterday.


(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 02/19/2003 12:30:16 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Saddam really has nothing to lose by firing off that bio/chem arsenal of his, at either our troops or Israeli cities (or both). He's a dead man anyway, so why not go out guns-a-blazing? I'd be very surprised if it went down otherwise.
2 posted on 02/19/2003 12:34:40 AM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
But according to Blix and the United Nations and France and Germany, Saddam has no chemical weapons. Woe is me! I am so confused . . . not.
3 posted on 02/19/2003 12:42:05 AM PST by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
We heard it from Dubya's lips......"The war on terrorism is going to be a different kind of war."

No doubt WMD's are part of his analogy.

4 posted on 02/19/2003 12:42:34 AM PST by FreeCanuckistan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: Mr. Mojo
Saddam really has nothing to lose by firing off that bio/chem arsenal of his, at either our troops or Israeli cities (or both).

The catch is, it's not Saddam who has his finger on all the launch buttons -- it's his military commanders. And how many of *them* are going to be willing to incur the wrath of the US, not to mention a lot of the Iraqi populace, by doing "scorched earth" on their *own* country just so Saddam can have one last suicidal gesture?

I suspect that when the end is in sight, Saddam will have very, very few people willing to go out in a blaze of glory with him.

I think the odds are good that as soon as Saddam seals himself in his underground bunker and starts giving "we'll all die together" orders, his army is going to say, "what do you mean 'we'", and pour concrete down the entrance tunnel to his bunker.

6 posted on 02/19/2003 12:55:01 AM PST by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FreeCanuckistan
Ok, this explains the slow crawl to war. Also somewhat confirms the rumor that U.S. soldiers are in Bagdad and testing the defenses.

Guess this will be an unconventional war - it will be a chess match.
7 posted on 02/19/2003 12:58:04 AM PST by ClancyJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: freedomworks
Don't forget Carter is talking about going over there also ..
8 posted on 02/19/2003 1:00:13 AM PST by Mo1 (DC Chapter .. Patriots Rally for America IV .. on Saturday, March 1st)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: Mo1
Don't forget Carter is talking about going over there also ..

One can hope he will take Jacques Chiraq with him.........

10 posted on 02/19/2003 1:09:52 AM PST by Siobhan († Pray the Divine Mercy Chaplet †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: freedomworks
LOL .. OK I promise not to
11 posted on 02/19/2003 1:19:33 AM PST by Mo1 (DC Chapter .. Patriots Rally for America IV .. on Saturday, March 1st)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ClancyJ
I think you're correct that "this explains the slow crawl to war." As do concerns on the homefront regarding terrorist cells.

The dirty politics directed at the US by several countries is no help either. It's like some global socialist entity (disguised as the UN), against the sovereignty and free will of the USA.

The UN in its present form, will be a deserving casualty in all this.

12 posted on 02/19/2003 1:23:25 AM PST by FreeCanuckistan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: jodenkoekje
"And I will point out that some of those generals signed their ballots for Saddam in blood."

But I'd be willing to bet you that it wasn't their idea, nor did they draw their own blood. You can be sure one of the security goons drew it for them, and not nicely.

14 posted on 02/19/2003 1:40:10 AM PST by 11B3 (Liberalism is mental retardation. They should all be institutionalized. Permanently.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon
The catch is, it's not Saddam who has his finger on all the launch buttons -- it's his military commanders.

It is possible that Saddam could detonate prepositioned weapons by remote control. Just picture Saddam deep under Baghdad in his nuclear proof bunker. He could have the city over head ringed with chemical and biological WMD. It would be a trivial task to bury remote dentonation lines. Finding the WMD and cutting off his detonation logistics will be a key to keeping civilian casualities within Baghdad low.

Here is the story on the US Army 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiments name

"The words "Brave Rifles" are from the accolade given the Regiment by General Winfield Scott, Commanding General of the Army, for its action at Capultepec during the Mexican War and the gray color of the letters and numerical designation in simulating the color of steel allude to the Regimental Motto "Blood and Steel" which was derived from the same accolade ("Brave Rifles! Veterans! You have been baptized in fire and blood and have come out steel.") "

15 posted on 02/19/2003 2:09:13 AM PST by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: freedomworks
The ONLY way I see him being able to do that is by holding SOME kind of hostages....!

They aren't hostages. They have put themselves in that position voluntarily. Their mistake is that we don't care. A target is a target. You can't see who is next to a target from 20,000 feet above and 500 knots.

16 posted on 02/19/2003 2:11:19 AM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Thud
We speculated upon this.
17 posted on 02/19/2003 4:20:52 AM PST by Dark Wing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Don't forget Carter is talking about going over there also

fantastic! I sure hope jimmuh the nobelpeaceprizeTM winner goes too! and if mandoola goes as well, i'll be ecstatic!

18 posted on 02/19/2003 4:55:25 AM PST by chilepepper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
But wait a minute...the French said he doesn't *have* any chemical or biological weapons :-)
19 posted on 02/19/2003 5:05:45 AM PST by smc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
I recommend we go in upwind of Baghdad - just in case.


If anything goes off we'll just wait a few days ...
20 posted on 02/19/2003 6:17:53 AM PST by Tunehead54 (----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson