Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bethlehem Steel collapse leaves retired workers scrambling for benefits
Associated Press / SFGate

Posted on 02/09/2003 3:24:34 PM PST by RCW2001

DAVID B. CARUSO, Associated Press Writer
Sunday, February 9, 2003
©2003 Associated Press

URL: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2003/02/09/financial1618EST0019.DTL

(02-09) 14:10 PST BETHLEHEM, Pa. (AP) --

Some of them went to work in the blast furnaces when they were just 18, then spent half a lifetime handling molten slag and inhaling steel dust in some of the most dangerous jobs on earth.

But for the tens of thousands of Bethlehem Steel workers who stuck it out, retirement brought a rich reward: A hefty pension and a lifetime of almost free health care for themselves and their families.

"It was capitalism's version of socialized medicine," said James Van Vliet, a retired Bethlehem Steel vice president. "And it was an implied contract. It was the company and the workers saying, `We are going to take care of each other."'

It may go down in history as a promise unfulfilled.

Bankrupt and only a shadow of its former might, Bethlehem Steel on Friday announced it was seeking bankruptcy court approval to terminate health and life insurance benefits for 95,000 retired workers March 31.

It was seen as essential to the company's bid to sell its assets to International Steel Group, and followed news in December that Bethlehem Steel's pension plan was underfunded by $3.2 billion and would be turned over to a government agency.

Both were expected. The American steel industry has been in decline for decades, and most of its former giants have been trimming pensions and benefits for retirees for years. Moreover, corporate America largely has shifted the responsibility of old-age provisioning to workers, with self-funded plans such as 401(k) accounts.

But the one-two punch is still a staggering blow for a generation that had been promised a lifetime of comforts in return for a career spent at one company. Now, some are facing the prospect of seeing their monthly $6 payments for health insurance jump to between $200 and $300.

"That's a lot to swallow," said Len Christman, 67, who worked 39 years at Bethlehem Steel's sprawling plant in Bethlehem, about 40 miles north of Philadelphia. "It's a very tough position to be in at this stage in life."

Nearly all retirees will still get some benefits. Pension payments, being taken over by the Pension Benefit Guarantee Corp., are expected to continue at about 90 percent of their former level. For workers over 65, the federal Medicare program will pick up some health care costs.

But Medicare, which covers hospital visits but doesn't pay for medications, won't come close to covering all the health-related costs of many retired steel workers.

Joe Pancoe, who worked for Bethlehem Steel for 31 years with spray paint and asbestos, said that at 81, he has asthma and a hacking cough, and uses a slew of pills and inhalers to soothe his battered lungs.

"We, the old timers, were part of the industrial revolution. And now, we are part of the medical revolution. We have the emphysemas, we have the cancers. We have everything," he said.

Almost all workers agree Bethlehem Steel is in little position to help. When it declared bankruptcy in October 2001, the company had about 12,000 employees, down from more than 300,000 during World War II. Most factories have been closed.

On Saturday, Bethlehem's board approved the sale of the company's assets to International Steel Group, a new steel producer cobbled together by financier Wilbur Ross from other distressed steel mills. The deal is subject to approval by the bankruptcy court.

Bruce Davis, a retired Bethlehem Steel lawyer who serves as legal counsel for the Retired Employees Benefit Coalition, said several labor groups are negotiating to extend health-care benefits, at least temporarily.

The coalition has asked the company to continue health benefits through May, rather than March. It also anticipates that it will be able to offer retirees a replacement health insurance package similar to ones offered at other bankrupt steel companies.

©2003 Associated Press  


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 02/09/2003 3:24:34 PM PST by RCW2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
This is sad.
2 posted on 02/09/2003 3:29:20 PM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Unions deserve what they get.

Socailism is not sustainable.
3 posted on 02/09/2003 3:29:54 PM PST by MonroeDNA (dware ROCKS!!!! 101 mussels in one sitting, rasied over $2000 to keep the lights on at FR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: RCW2001
a lifetime of almost free health care for themselves and their families.

FREE thats funny I thought it was part of a contract as wages earned...BIOYA

5 posted on 02/09/2003 3:43:49 PM PST by joesnuffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Just why is the government subsidizing the pension benefits of failed corporations who failed to fund properly? How does that work exactly? Does anyone know?
6 posted on 02/09/2003 3:48:41 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
The reason the steel company is bankrupt is because their retiree benefits package added so much to the cost of each ton of steel that they weren't able to compete in a global marketplace, even with government protectionism.
7 posted on 02/09/2003 3:51:41 PM PST by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MonroeDNA
Amen and AMEN!

Stupid unions rip off their own and the company and only the lawyers and the mafia (one in the same) get rich!
8 posted on 02/09/2003 3:54:50 PM PST by Lurking2Long
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mvpel
And a hearty AMEN to your post as well!
9 posted on 02/09/2003 3:55:54 PM PST by Lurking2Long
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Here is a bit of news on the "Pension Benefit Guarantee Corp"...

Government Pension Program Has Shortfall
Government Pension Insurance Program Racks Up $3.6 Billion Record Shortfall

The Associated Press

WASHINGTON Jan. 30

The government program protecting workers' retirement income earned in private employer-sponsored pension plans posted a record $3.6 billion shortfall in 2002 after burning through its entire $7.7 billion surplus last year.

The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. said Thursday that the bulk of that $11.4 billion net loss last year also the largest in the agency's 28-year history was from securing a record number of underfunded pension plans at bankrupt and financially troubled companies, particularly in the steel industry.

The PBGC's executive director, Steven A. Kandarian, said the insurance program still had sufficient assets to pay benefits to retirees "for a number of years." But officials must find new ways to financially strengthen the program to meet future obligations, he said.

About 80 percent, or $9.3 billion, of the $11.4 billion net loss was because of underfunded single-employer plans. Declining interest rates accounted for nearly $1.7 billion of the loss.

The PBGC's last deficit was in 1995, at $315 million. The only surpluses it has recorded were in 1996 through 2001.

Two key lawmakers said they intend to examine the financial troubles at the agency. Rep. John Boehner, R-Ohio, chairman of the Education and Workforce Committee, and Rep. Sam Johnson, R-Texas, a subcommittee chairman, said a hearing will be held in the spring.

The hearing will "examine both the challenges facing the PBGC and the mandated funding formulas used by corporations and unions to determine if any challenges need to be made in order to better protect American workers," Johnson said.

The PBGC was created in 1974 to guarantee payment of basic pension benefits. About 44 million American workers and retirees currently have pensions under PBGC control. The agency is financed by insurance premiums paid by companies that sponsor pension plans and by PBGC's investment returns.

A Treasury official said the financial report "is a wake-up call, reminding us of the work we need to do now so that retirees continue to receive in coming years the pension benefits they have earned," said Peter Fisher, treasury undersecretary for domestic finance who also sits on PBGC's board of directors.

He said officials need to carefully select a permanent replacement for the 30-year bond as the rate for valuing pension liabilities. A higher rate, for example, would diminish liabilities.

Other ideas being considered are a hike in employer premiums, tightening funding requirements for pensions and imposing restrictions on benefit increases in underfunded plans.

The PBGC last year had its largest pension takeover ever when it insured the underfunded pension plans of LTV Corp. for $1.85 billion. The steel industry accounted for almost 80 percent of the underfunded plans in 2002.

Already this year, the PBGC has moved to take over the pension plans of National Steel and Bethlehem Steel, which together account for $5.16 billion and are not included in 2002 financial numbers.

The agency assumed control over 144 pension plans covering 187,000 people last year, up from 104 plans and 89,00 participants in 2001 a record increase.

Also, the PBGC paid a record $1.5 billion in benefits, nearly 50 percent higher than 2001.

Separately, the PBGC's multi-employer program, covering 9.5 million participants in 1,661 plans, remained financially strong in 2002. It had a surplus if $158 million, up from $116 million in 2001.


10 posted on 02/09/2003 3:57:22 PM PST by RCW2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Thanks. It is odd there is at once a government insurance program and a tolerance of unfunded defined benefit plan pension liabilities. It reminds me of the days when Savings and Loans could do anything with deposits guaranteed by FSLIC. Sheer financial madness. In this case, perhaps it simply represents a transfer payment to feckless and mismanaged companies from well managed and financially prudent firms. That is not the kind of behavior I have any desire to subsidize myself.
11 posted on 02/09/2003 4:01:34 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Torie
the pension benefits of failed corporations who failed to fund properly

The applicable alphabet soup is ERISA. Congress once took upon itself to guarantee pension benefits to workers the same way it guaranteed back deposits. The company is liable to the fund only to the extent of 1/3 of its net worth, which in Bessie's case is about zero.

Other, smaller companies that were not backrupt have opted to default and pay over 1/3 of their net worth to get out of all pension obligations. This has already happened and is now an accepted option to resolve pension plans that get too expensive. It is the kind of nonsense that comes out of government give aways that are not well thought out.

12 posted on 02/09/2003 4:03:32 PM PST by Mike4Freedom (Freedom is the one thing that you cannot have unless you grant it to everyone else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NFifty15
You forget that many of today's retirees collected relatively small salaries when they were working. Part of their compensation was the promise of pension and health care after they retired. They never had the chance to have an IRA, 401(k) or other tax deferred retirement account.

I think today's workers will be better off, because they have the financial tools to save for their own retirement, and there are even better savings plans (MSA's, or Bush's new savings plans) in the pipeline. They get higher salaries and less job security in trade.

But you can't compare what people earned in the past (low salary and retirement security) to what current workers get (high salaries and financial independence/responsibility). It's no more fair to take away half of what older folks earned (retirement security) than it would be to confiscate IRA's from younger people just as they reach retirement age.

And, no, I'm not one of the retirees affected.

13 posted on 02/09/2003 4:12:05 PM PST by speekinout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MonroeDNA
I hope that someone as f&%&^$g stupid as you hasn't reproduced. Unions certainly aren't perfect but they have given much more to this country than have ignorant dupes that buy into every anti-union message written or spoken.
Continued erosion of health care benefits will continue to under mind the social compact and the health and spirit of this nation.
14 posted on 02/09/2003 4:16:48 PM PST by em2vn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: em2vn
What "social compact" is that which will be under mind [sic]? I wasn't aware of that one.
15 posted on 02/09/2003 4:50:25 PM PST by jammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: em2vn
"I hope that someone as f&%&^$g stupid as you hasn't reproduced. "

Don't sugar-coat it; tell us what you really think.

Unions force employers to pay more for under-performing workers. The employers are then forced to raise prices to pay for the slackers.

Other non-union companies reward employees based on performance, and fire the workers who fail to perform. These companies get more for their money, and can sell their wares at a lower cost than union companies. And we, the consumers, get better products, cheaper.

Unions served a role 50 years ago, but now they are a drag on themselves, their employers, and the economy. They are going extinct, and rightly so.

16 posted on 02/09/2003 4:52:31 PM PST by MonroeDNA (dware ROCKS!!!! 101 mussels in one sitting, rasied over $2000 to keep the lights on at FR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: em2vn
BTW, it's not "under mind," but "undermined."

I see you are ready for non-union employment.
17 posted on 02/09/2003 4:54:57 PM PST by MonroeDNA (dware ROCKS!!!! 101 mussels in one sitting, rasied over $2000 to keep the lights on at FR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: mvpel
The reason the steel company is bankrupt is because their retiree benefits package added so much to the cost of each ton of steel that they weren't able to compete in a global marketplace, even with government protectionism.

Other factors include:
Managerial incompetence.
Unions protecting the dead weight.
And failure to upgrade equipment so that the process of business was cost-effective.

Plainly speaking, the business was run into the ground.
18 posted on 02/09/2003 4:57:43 PM PST by Thoro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Thoro
...they weren't able to compete in a global marketplace, even with government protectionism.

The Asian Steel Mills have been selling cheaper steel in USA for Yrs....some of the BEST steel sold in the USA, is Made in non-union steel mills...read in the WSJ a few yrs. back

19 posted on 02/09/2003 5:22:04 PM PST by skinkinthegrass (Just be because your paranoid,doesn't mean they aren't out to get you. :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Thoro
...they weren't able to compete in a global marketplace, even with government protectionism.

The Asian Steel Mills have been selling cheaper steel in USA for Yrs....some of the BEST steel sold in the USA, is Made in non-union USA steel mills...read in the WSJ a few yrs. back

20 posted on 02/09/2003 5:22:49 PM PST by skinkinthegrass (Just be because your paranoid,doesn't mean they aren't out to get you. :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson