______________________________________
Oddly enough Hayeks last paragraph reinforces Klein's point as made in his review.. Here tis, as you emphasized it:
"None of these conclusions are arguments against the use of reason, but only arguments against such uses as require any exclusive and coercive powers of government; not arguments against experimentation, but arguments against all exclusive, monopolistic power to experiment in a particular field-power which brooks no alternative and which lays a claim to the possession of superior wisdom -- and against the consequent preclusion of solutions better than the ones to which those in power have committed themselves.
-121-
Hayek previously explained this in more detail to those, -- who imo seek to see Hayek as advocating a anti-libertarian type of morality, -- here:
"The antirationalistic position here taken must not be confounded with irrationalism or any appeal to mysticism.
What is advocated here is not an abdication of reason but a rational examination of the field where reason is appropriately put in control."
Klein opined:
"Hayek's philosophy and those of Milton Friedman, David Boaz, and Charles Murray are all very similar. Rothbard's "anarcho-capitalism," too, is largely congruent. All are now properly considered to be varieties of libertarianism. Hayek wisely rejected rationalist libertarianism.