Skip to comments.
US Forces on Alert for Possible Movement Near Korea
Reuters via Yahoo! ^
| Monday, February 3, 2003
| Reuters
Posted on 02/03/2003 2:50:06 PM PST by Momaw Nadon
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Some U.S. bombers, fighter jets and warships have been alerted for possible deployment to the western Pacific to deter any aggression by North Korea in case of a war in Iraq, U.S. defense officials said on Monday.
The officials told Reuters that Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld had not issued any final orders to move B-52 bombers, F-16 fighter jets or naval units closer to the tense Korean peninsula, now gripped in a nuclear crisis.
The additional forces have been requested by Adm. Thomas Fargo, based in Hawaii as head of U.S. forces in the Pacific and Asia rim.
"If such forces are moved, it would be done as a precautionary deterrent presence against any North Korean aggression in the event of a war in Iraq," said one of the officials, who asked not to be identified.
Officials stressed the possible deployment did not include any ground forces to join the 37,000 American troops stationed in South Korea.
Officials said that additional F-16 fighter jets could be moved from the United States to bases in Japan and that heavy B-52 or B-1B bombers could be moved to within emergency striking distance of North Korea -- perhaps to Guam.
The aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson, currently in Hawaii, might also be deployed toward the troubled Korean peninsula if the carrier USS Kitty Hawk is ordered to leave the western Pacific and head for the gulf in the event President Bush (news - web sites) decides to launch an invasion of Iraq, officials said.
The defense officials spoke as North Korea said on Monday its troops were at the ready in case of any U.S. "military and political moves" against it as tensions rose over the nuclear crisis on the peninsula.
The U.N. watchdog that oversaw a freeze in the communist state's nuclear program until it was thrown out in December also said it would hold an emergency session on Feb. 12 and was likely to ask the U.N. Security Council to take up the issue.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Japan; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Unclassified
KEYWORDS: bombers; fighterjets; guam; korea; northkorea; pacific; warships
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
FYI and discussion
To: Momaw Nadon
What a terrible title for this article.
2
posted on
02/03/2003 2:52:16 PM PST
by
finnman69
To: Momaw Nadon
War in Iraq within a week.....two on the outside.
3
posted on
02/03/2003 2:52:27 PM PST
by
Dog
To: Momaw Nadon
Careful with that headline.
It sounded like NK was doing the moving.
To: finnman69
That sound you heard was us removing the saber from the scabbard..
5
posted on
02/03/2003 2:54:30 PM PST
by
Dog
To: Semper Paratus; finnman69
Reuters does need a better headline writer.
To: Semper Paratus
That is the headline over on Yahoo...
7
posted on
02/03/2003 2:55:50 PM PST
by
Dog
To: Momaw Nadon
The trick is to move forces to deter NK aggression without spooking them to the point where they attack because of it.
8
posted on
02/03/2003 2:55:55 PM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: Dog
Im with ya on that. It was my 21st B-DAY party the ground war started in '91. Today I found out 2 Bigshot types I know got their orders. So yeah, I believe you are correct.
9
posted on
02/03/2003 2:56:09 PM PST
by
cmsgop
( Arby's says no more Horsey Sauce for Scott Ritter !!!!)
To: Dog
Rockets are red,
radiation is blue.
Saddam gets a valentine,
Kim Il jung too.
10
posted on
02/03/2003 2:56:37 PM PST
by
tet68
To: Momaw Nadon
Korea is where diplomacy will work. Though tough on the current President as elections put a hard core commie in charge.
I have problems believing this threads title.
To: Dog Gone
I know the South Korean force is a good one. Well Trained. Do you know their #s? Added to our guys?
12
posted on
02/03/2003 2:58:33 PM PST
by
cmsgop
( Arby's says no more Horsey Sauce for Scott Ritter !!!!)
To: Dog
You really think that soon? Won't they have to get those inspectors out,and the world will know when that happens, won't it? I have been waiting patiently for this war but don't want to get caught offguard. Going skiing Saturday for 8 days and I would hate like hell to miss it!!!
To: Momaw Nadon
This deterance should have never been leaked or reported in this manner-especially.
To: Momaw Nadon
Other than as a cruise missile platform, it seems like B-52's would be of limited utility NK until air supremacy was achieved. They were pretty vulnerable to SAM's thirty years ago over North Vietnam, and I would think NK's air defenses are at LEAST at that level, and probably much stronger.
15
posted on
02/03/2003 2:59:55 PM PST
by
kms61
To: cajungirl
Won't they have to get those inspectors out,and the world will know when that happens, won't it?No and no.
16
posted on
02/03/2003 3:00:38 PM PST
by
Poohbah
(Beware the fury of a patient man -- John Dryden)
To: Momaw Nadon
To: cajungirl
Going skiing Saturday for 8 days and I would hate like hell to miss it!!! You more than likely will miss it. Have fun skiing though .... can't imagine a better thing to be doing.
18
posted on
02/03/2003 3:01:38 PM PST
by
Centurion2000
(The question is not whether you're paranoid, but whether you're paranoid enough.)
To: cmsgop
I've seen the number, but I don't recall it. Maybe 400,000 at most.
It's certainly far less than what NK has mobilized.
19
posted on
02/03/2003 3:01:40 PM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: finnman69
a terrible title for this article No kidding. Movement in Korea would put Iraq on the back burner immediately.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson