Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Links Saddam, Al Qaeda
CBSNEWS via WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Friday, January 31, 2003

Posted on 01/31/2003 5:28:14 AM PST by JohnHuang2

(CBS) Drawing the tightest link yet between the regime of Saddam Hussein and the followers of Osama bin Laden, the Bush Administration connected the murder of an American diplomat in Jordan to a senior al Qaeda operative in Baghdad.

Members of Congress heard new details in the president's case for war against Iraq, including Iraq links to the murder of diplomat Laurence Foley in Jordan on Oct. 28, 2002.

"A recent assassination of our diplomat in Amman, Mr. Foley, that was apparently orchestrated by an al Qaeda member who is resident in Baghdad," said Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage.

As CBS News Correspondent David Martin reports, the operative is said to have been wounded during the bombing of Afghanistan and took refuge in Baghdad.

Armitage said flatly, "There are al Qaeda in Baghdad."

Secretary of State Colin Powell will unveil intelligence to back up those claims next week to the U.N. Security Council along with other intelligence documenting Iraq's efforts to deceive the U.N. weapons inspectors.

He will present satellite photos showing a flurry of activity around suspect weapons sites days and, in some cases, hours before U.N. weapons inspectors arrive. However, the photos do not reveal what is being moved. The Iraqis will no doubt claim the activity was all in a normal day's work.

There will also be communications intercepts of senior Iraqi officials telling workers at those sites to make sure they have been cleaned up along with directions on what they are to say to the inspectors when they arrive. But, like the photos, the intercepts do not reveal exactly what is being cleaned up.

Powell will also present Iraqi defectors who have told the U.S. about mobile biological weapons vans Saddam is hiding. What is lacking is an actual photo of the vans.

"The problem is they're parked, we believe, in either one of the many, many underground facilities or someone's garage," says Armitage.

The issue at hand is that Powell will not have the kind of smoking gun Adlai Stevenson had when he went before the U.N. in 1962 to unveil U-2 photos of Soviet nuclear missiles being erected in Cuba.

During the Cuban Missile Crisis, photos clearly showed three of the four launching pads.

Powell's intelligence, however, will show a suspicious pattern of behavior -- the same pattern the world has let Saddam get away with for the last 12 years.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Friday, January 31, 2003

Quote of the Day by abner

1 posted on 01/31/2003 5:28:14 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Al-Qaeda in Baghdad.

DEFINITELY don't need a new congressional authorization for Iraq now. That provides the link. Harboring, aiding, abetting -- the end of discussion.
2 posted on 01/31/2003 5:30:59 AM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Better to leak this now and lower expectations. Not as much info as I would have hoped for, but it's enough for any reasonable person.
3 posted on 01/31/2003 5:34:07 AM PST by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
IMHO the icing was already on the cake. This just adds a little more ice cream. I was already convinced and trusted my country's leadership decision to "dig a little deeper"(can you say bunker buster).
4 posted on 01/31/2003 5:53:22 AM PST by showme_the_Glory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Powell does NOT need a smoking gun. That is just a buzz phrase the media and RATS enjoy throwing out.
5 posted on 01/31/2003 6:09:08 AM PST by kassie (God Bless and Protect Our Military)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kassie
smoking gun...That is just a buzz phrase the media and RATS enjoy throwing out

Exactly -- and I would put 'empty chemical warheads' in the same 'talking points/buzz-phrase' category.

6 posted on 01/31/2003 6:11:36 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kassie
Interestingly, the media/Rats didn't need any 'smoking gun' when Clinton bombed Baghdad on the eve of his impeachment (Dec. '98), nor when he launched an unprovoked attack against Serbia 3 months later to distract from explosive rape allegations by Juanita Broaddrick. Media/Democrat hypocrisy? Can't find any other name for it.
7 posted on 01/31/2003 6:15:14 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
The RATS and the media seem to suffer from the disease Double Standard.
8 posted on 01/31/2003 6:28:57 AM PST by kassie (God Bless and Protect Our Military)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kassie
Exactly.
9 posted on 01/31/2003 6:37:23 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Interestingly, the media/Rats didn't need any 'smoking gun' when Clinton bombed Baghdad on the eve of his impeachment (Dec. '98), nor when he launched an unprovoked attack against Serbia 3 months later to distract from explosive rape allegations by Juanita Broaddrick. Media/Democrat hypocrisy? Can't find any other name for it.

Yeah! I would like to see that point emphasized more.

10 posted on 01/31/2003 6:47:45 AM PST by RAT Patrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Suprise, Suprise!
11 posted on 01/31/2003 6:58:33 AM PST by magrueser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
"DEFINITELY don't need a new congressional authorization for Iraq now. "

Wrongo, mate. I will only be convinced when Saddam admits this complicity, and even then, it may not suffice. You see, he might just be saying that to allow the NASTY Bush family to come in and take over the oil which, as everyone knows, is Bush's only goal.

Tongue taken out of cheek!
12 posted on 01/31/2003 7:45:44 AM PST by lawdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RAT Patrol
I would like to see that point emphasized more.

Morning, friend. I'm amazed more Republicans -- or allies of the administration -- don't throw this flagrant example of hypocrisy back in their faces.

13 posted on 01/31/2003 8:01:14 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Powell will also present Iraqi defectors who have told the U.S. about mobile biological weapons vans Saddam is hiding. What is lacking is an actual photo of the vans.

Whoa...hold the presses...

January 31, 2003 -- WASHINGTON - Secretary of State Colin Powell next week will show the U.N. Security Council dramatic photographs of Iraqi agents carrying truckloads of documents and bulldozing suspected chemical-weapons facilities hours before the arrival of U.N. weapons inspectors, it was revealed last night. Powell also will unveil secret photos of tractor-trailers with abnormally large vents. The trucks are suspected to be Iraq’s mobile bio-weapons labs.

Source - FR Post

Do they have photos or don't they? Also odd that one story calls them vans, another calls them tractor-trailers...which is it? Or both? Note: Although it doesn't make much difference to me as I have done my research and totally trust Bush, these conflicting stories have the potential to cause more confusion on the matter.

14 posted on 01/31/2003 8:04:31 AM PST by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lawdude
Hey, lawdude, you a lawyer?

Did you see the thread on German arms sales to Iraq on "breaking news" section. Good stuff.
15 posted on 01/31/2003 8:06:37 AM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
Not as much info as I would have hoped for, but it's enough for any reasonable person.

See my post #14...there is another FR thread that states they DO have pictures of the mobile labs.

16 posted on 01/31/2003 8:08:44 AM PST by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter
See my post #14...

Thanks for the good news. The Demowimps are going to look pretty bad, except for the fact that the media will suddenly come down with a case of collective amnesia. "We never said that we shouldn't go to war."

17 posted on 01/31/2003 8:17:23 AM PST by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
IMHO, we have more than just a few wobbly ragheads with disguised voices and faces testifying against Saddam behind bullet-proof glass.

Surely, you don't think Dubya is stupid enough to let Powell spill the gravy all over the table before suppertime, now do you?

18 posted on 01/31/2003 8:21:59 AM PST by Happy2BMe (It's All About You - It's All About Me - It's All About Being Free!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson