No, but since that's not what the article is claiming, there's no need to examine that bizarre scenario.
I guess evolution just knew how to design a perfectly matching system for the female. Not only perfectly matching and cooperative reproductive systems, but also perfectly matching internal systems that make up the miracle of the human body.
Learn something about evolution, and you won't pose such goofy questions. That's not what the article says, nor what evolution predicts.
For insight into why "descended from a single man" doesn't mean "there was only one man we're descended from", read this, which deals with similar misconceptions resulting from earlier research into the "mitochondrial Eve", mankind's common *female* ancestor. The same points apply to the current "single male" research.
Is it not obviously, undeniably impossible for another human to be produced without a male and female?
Yes. So?
God DID create them, male and female, and they DID increase in number from that point on.
According to all available evidence (and there's tons of it), if He did, he did it by evolution from earlier hominid primates.