Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Plurality Says Go It Alone to Get Hussein
Scott Polls ^ | January 24, 2003 | Scott Polls

Posted on 01/25/2003 5:02:46 PM PST by DrDeb

The credibility of the United Nations may be on the line in the War with Iraq. Yet, as the world awaits the January 27 report from inspectors, just 48% of Americans have a favorable opinion of the United Nations. Thirty-one percent (31%) have an unfavorable opinion while 21% are not sure.

In another sign of limited support for the UN, a question was asked about how the US should act if the United Nations "opposes taking military action against Iraq." Even if the world body goes on record opposing War, 46% of Americans would support the United States acting alone to remove Saddam Hussein from power. Only 36% said it would be better to co-operate with our allies and leave Hussein in power.

These results are from a national telephone survey of 1,000 adults conducted by Scott Rasmussen Public Opinion Research on January 22 and 23, 2003. The margin of error for the full sample is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence.

Please share your thoughts on the situation with Iraq.

Other survey results have found Americans overwhelmingly prefer to act with the support of allies. However, the questions typically imply that the choice is between acting alone to remove Hussein or working with others to remove him from power. That's a bit like asking about motherhood and apple pie. Obviously, if Hussein would be removed from power either way, Americans would prefer to work with allies.

In the real world, however, the President may be asked to make a tougher choice between going it alone to accomplish our objectives or working with allies and letting Hussein continue to rule Iraq. With that tougher choice in mind, only one-third of Americans are convinced that working with our allies is the higher priority.

This is consistent with other survey data collected in November. Americans strongly support President Bush's assertion of American leadership. Most (52%) say that, in the interest of co-operation, it would be better if our allies did what the United States wants more often. Just 20% took the opposite and said it would be better for America to do what our allies want more often. 23% took a middle ground and said neither approach would be better.

Ultimately, public reaction to events in Iraq will be determined by the success or failure of the policies. If the President fails to take action, it is likely that his approval ratings will tumble. A December survey found that sixty-three percent (63%) believed that if the United States fails to take military action, Saddam Hussein will become more of a threat to our country.

If the President does take action, the American public will measure the results rather than the rhetoric.

One other point moving modestly in the President's favor is that inspections have convinced more Americans that Iraq is housing weapons of mass destruction. Seventy-five percent (75%) now believe that Saddam Hussein and the government of Iraq have nuclear or biological Weapons of Mass Destruction. That's up from 69% earlier in the month.

Only 8% believe Hussein does not control such weapons.


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Announcements; Front Page News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iraq; saddamhussein
Thought you might enjoy a poll that provides a different (more accurate?!) perspective relative to the public's perception of Iraq and the UN!
1 posted on 01/25/2003 5:02:46 PM PST by DrDeb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DrDeb

2 posted on 01/25/2003 5:57:58 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DrDeb
Better to g it alone. Outside of Britian, most other allies will just get in the way.
3 posted on 01/25/2003 6:10:44 PM PST by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots
I feel somewhat better about this whole issue (UN vs. going it alone ) this evening than I did this morning. Not that the situation is that much changed, but our ratcheting up the pressure even more in the next few weeks will likely set off some actions by Saddam or Bin Laden supporters that will firm up and crystallize our position. Lot's of those folks are unstable enough that they might think that they can either precipitate or stop a war (take your pick) by some terrible action against civilians in the West. Obviously I'm not hoping such a scenario comes to pass, but I'm sure enough in my own mind that THEY will try some sort of pre-emptive strike, that the doubters among us will no longer be unsure of our proper course of action.
4 posted on 01/25/2003 6:49:44 PM PST by CedarDave (We gave peace a chance, what we got was 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots
"They either attack us for trying to dominate Europe or they attack us for withdrawing from Europe, or that we won't use our nuclear force or that we'll get them into a war and they're not consulted."

-John F. Kennedy

History repeats itself (thanks to Samurai_Jack for the quote)

5 posted on 01/26/2003 8:48:39 AM PST by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DrDeb
President Bush is doing what is necessary to protect American interests, we are assured.
6 posted on 01/27/2003 10:23:40 PM PST by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson