Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US working "assiduously" to keep Israel out of Iraq war
Agence France-Presse (via ClariNet) ^

Posted on 01/23/2003 7:00:42 PM PST by RCW2001

Thursday, 23-Jan-2003 8:00AM      Story from AFP
Copyright 2003 by Agence France-Presse (via ClariNet)

</CLARI-ITEM HEADER>

MOSCOW, Jan 23 (AFP) - The US State Department number two said Thursday that Washington was working "assiduously" to make sure that Israel does not get dragged into war should the United States decide to strike Iraq.

However US Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage said that Washington had no authority to demand that Israel drop its right to self-defense.

"Should there be conflict, we would hope that Israel would choose to stay out. We are not desirous of having Israel enter into military combat should that occur," Armitage told Moscow Echo radio on conclusion of a two-day visit to Moscow.

"We are staying in extraordinarily close contact with our friends, our allies in Israel in the hopes that we can persuade Israel that they don't need to involve themselves if conflict occurs," he said.

"But let me be clear that the United States or any other country could never ask a second country to give up the right of self-defense. But we are working very assiduously to try to calm any fears that exist in Israel."

Israel has warned that it will retaliate against Baghdad should Iraq strike the Jewish state in reprisal for a US-led campaign aimed at unseating President Saddam Hussein.

zak/bb/cml

Iraq-US-Russia-Israel


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Israel
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 01/23/2003 7:00:42 PM PST by RCW2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
I would imagine that Iraq will strike out at Israel the moment that the bombs begin to fall, and see little reason why Israel won't retaliate immediately.
2 posted on 01/23/2003 7:05:28 PM PST by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
any non-conventional warhead from Iraq drops on Israel and I imagine it's "bye-bye Baghdad" ... I sure hate to see the "Genie Out of the Bottle" but you know some of those Islamic groups are working very hard to get chem, bio and nuclear ... and they'll use it ... 9/11 and the Intifada against Israel showed just what they are capable of ... and how many are sympathetic to their cause ...
3 posted on 01/23/2003 7:21:01 PM PST by Bobby777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
So RCW, are you a Catholic from Maryount?
4 posted on 01/23/2003 7:24:51 PM PST by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Any hit on Israel should automatically be taken as a "get out of jail free" card to eliminate Arafat, wipe out the Palestinians as well as Hezbollah in Lebanon. If Israel does not take this opportunity to clean house then they are fools.
5 posted on 01/23/2003 7:30:36 PM PST by ConservativeConvert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
It's interesting, or perhaps ironic, that the US is so insistent that it must go to war against Iraq, and without delay, and even without allies if need be, but it wants just the opposite reaction from Israel even in response to direct shelling from Iraq.

Sharon had said that an Iraqi attack on Israel will be met "with every resource" - presumably that means Israel's (widely presumed but never admitted) nuclear armament. If that is the case, Iraq might well cease to exist. One bomb on Baghdad and another on the Iraqi oilfields and after that Iraq just becomes a historical footnotes in editions of The 1001 Arabian Nights.

One interesting scenario for the aftermath of an Israeli nuking of Iraq is the partitioning of what's left of Iraq -- after all, the Iraqis seem very flexible about their geography, having been willing 12 years ago to call Kuwait their new 19th province -- one substantial chunk becomes the new Kurdish homeland (funny how the Palestinians have "inalienable" rights - but only to land after it first is taken by Jews - but not the Kurds), and another substantial chunk becomes the New Palestinian Homeland with all the Moslems transferred out of Israel into this piece of defeated Iraq.

6 posted on 01/23/2003 7:48:44 PM PST by DonQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Why or why does the US still have a double standard?
7 posted on 01/23/2003 9:15:28 PM PST by yonif
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DonQ
The US keeps looking for allies but it forgets it has one called Israel, one which is capable of serving as an ally in getting Iraq.
8 posted on 01/23/2003 9:16:30 PM PST by yonif
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
LOL! I've been called a lot of things on this forum but never a "Catholic from Marymount". Gasp!! ;)
9 posted on 01/24/2003 7:51:53 AM PST by RCW2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
I wasn't calling you that, I was asking. So does that mean you are neither a Catholic or a graduate of Marymount?

You post all this stuff, and respond to nothing. You could be a Druid for all I know.

That's it. A Druid from Des Plaines.

10 posted on 01/24/2003 10:07:13 AM PST by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson