Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Are We Being Threatened
self | 1/11/03 | Pat Fisher

Posted on 01/11/2003 10:05:48 AM PST by drypowder

Are we being threatened?

OK, so we read the nasty news to find that North Korea withdraws from the nuclear treaty group that they didn’t abide by to begin with…I see no loss there. But then it’s inferred that if we don’t give them economic assistance or if we put sanctions on them…that could result in a declaration of war? My response to that would be: “OK, and so you’re going where with this?” We have dumped so much money into these communist nations already, in an effort to show good will and faith and all, and not one of them….or any other country we have helped financially, has ever paid us back a dime or shown any appreciation. No wonder we are over-drawn in the big check book. Are we their life-line? Can they not make it without us? And when we say we may take away their weekly allowance (through sanctions), they threaten to kick our ass? I don’t think so, and it wouldn’t be in their best interest to even go there. I think they know that too, because in the same article it stated that ‘they are willing to talk to Washington, to end the escalating crisis’. Can we say ‘bite the hand that helps feeds you’ (in a sense)? If they were as powerful as they thought they were, then why worry about us anyway? Oh yeah, they tried to kick our butts once before when my dad was a young man. Didn’t work then and won’t work now. Call your shot as far as I’m concerned, the odds are not in your favor! I guess you either love us or hate us if you’re another country, or a whining bleeding heart who wants to have a group hug with all the evil in this world rather than protect what is ours and what is right as we know it to be in our country. I am not an advocate of war in any means. I don’t want to lose my children or loved ones or any other person who is willing to fight to protect what we have or what someone else feels they have in their country. But neither am I an advocate of those who bitch and moan about the way we do things, and don’t have a workable resolution to what they are whining about. But until someone takes a hold of the reigns and works their stuff to the better of all and comes up with a solid plan, I will stand up and defend what I don’t wish to lose, and if that calls for some sacrificing, then that is the way it has to be. Nothing comes without cost of some sort. I do not, nor will I ever forgive those who had a hand in 9-1-1, nor anyone else who takes or destroys a way of life through hatred and intended violence. Do I think we would win a war against anyone? It’s like any athletic or board game…you won’t know until the game is over. Some games take muscle and others take intelligence and making the right moves at the right time, and some take both. That’s why it’s called a “battle”. And in any battle, no one is just going to sit back and let someone beat the hell out of them without trying to at least defend themselves. I guess the only other question I would have, is: Are we so dependent on other countries for our well-being, that we fear losing what we get from them? That’s a possibility! We do have oil under our ground, we can make or grow all that we need to survive on, provided that some of our own able-bodied lazy money-suckers get off their ‘give me something for nothing’ rear-ends, and work. Our relatives did it once…and we can do it too. We could probably put just about every man and woman in our own country to work and improve our economy if we depended on our self…and still have a wonderful life. And probably cheaper too. Even in business you very seldom save anything when you ‘out-source’ services. As long as this old world stays in-tact, there will always be world wars of some sort, even after we are all gone and the new crew takes our places. Do we stand up for what we believe in, or do we give in to that which may eventually turn even the USA into a third world country? It’s all about a “team” effort and working together. Oh, I’m sorry…that’s a concept for success. What was I thinking?

Patrick Fisher Napa, CA.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: nkorea

1 posted on 01/11/2003 10:05:49 AM PST by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

DONATE TODAY!!!.
SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD


2 posted on 01/11/2003 10:06:36 AM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drypowder
Can't disagree with you.

PS: Paragraphs are your friend </;o)

3 posted on 01/11/2003 10:26:09 AM PST by EggsAckley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: snicker
I have another take on it. The North Koreans were trying the same old tricks that worked with the Klinton administration. However the Bush administration would not bite and play along. The North Koreans in order to try and save face(important in Asian countries) made contact with Bill Richardson(back door)and are now trying to back peddle. Parley
5 posted on 01/11/2003 10:43:52 AM PST by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: snicker
I like your two Maxims.

I don't agree that the axis of evil speech was a disaster. For the first time in many many years a president said it like it was. This was needed. There had been too much pussyfooting around, saying everything except the truth.
The speech did NOT threaten North Korea. It identified a situation that has since been proven to be correct.

North Korea broke its 1994 agreements within months. It was all a sham and North Korea has been developing threats ever since. They have even threatened to nuke the US.

Sometimes identifying a situation is the first step to handling it.

6 posted on 01/11/2003 10:44:47 AM PST by sd-joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: drypowder
"Axis of Evil" couldn't have been closer to the truth.
North Korea has broken their treaty with us, so stop sending them oil and food - period.
We did not break the deal they did, so let them reap what they sow.
7 posted on 01/11/2003 11:55:09 AM PST by Dudesdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snicker; Alamo-Girl; backhoe; rightwing2; belmont_mark
...today Bill Richardson is apologizing.."

Bill Richardson does not represent the United States, and is and was a traitor of our country. Surprise, surprise that the North Koreans would race over to see him as their agency for parley.

8 posted on 01/11/2003 1:24:50 PM PST by Paul Ross (Golitsyn is being proved right, more so, every day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: snicker; ntrulock
He is not a current U.S. envoy or Ambassador, he was Clinton's UN chief, and Energy Secretary, wherein he perpetrated most of his mischief.
10 posted on 01/12/2003 1:16:43 PM PST by Paul Ross (Golitsyn is being proved right, more so, every day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: snicker
Snicker, signed up 1-11-03. Welcome to Free Republic.
11 posted on 01/12/2003 1:18:12 PM PST by Paul Ross (Golitsyn is being proved right, more so, every day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
A grave error on Bush' part any way you slice it. If Richardson set this up without pre-approval then Bush should have sent agents to arrest him right when the DPRK envoy was there - a little "message." If Bush asked Richardson to do this, then it reveals his soft spot that he apparently has for the previous administration - a soft spot that promotes this whole "I'm a a uniter not a divider" load of BS. In any case, it is clear that Bush and ilk are afraid to either overtly blame or prosecute Clinton era officials and their private sector cohorts even though the treason and incompetence are abundantly clear with even cursory examination.
12 posted on 01/12/2003 2:25:59 PM PST by GOP_1900AD (Un-PC even to "Conservatives!" - Right makes right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
True, but Richardson did a lot of damage when he was UN ambassador including "sharing" lots of sources and methods intell info with the Paks and Indians. Never crossed their minds that the Pak ISI might pass all that on to Al Qaeda. But that's just par for the course with these guys.
13 posted on 01/12/2003 4:31:52 PM PST by ntrulock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Dudesdad
so let them reap what they sow.

They are reaping highly enriched uranium. Wonder where they will sow it? Of course NK is nothing like Iraq. All they need is a stern talking to and everything will be fine.

Regards

J.R.

14 posted on 01/12/2003 4:38:21 PM PST by NMC EXP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson