Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Smart Guns' are Safer Guns
Christian Science Moniter ^ | 1/7/03 | (Author unnamed)

Posted on 01/07/2003 11:20:22 AM PST by hoosierskypilot

New Jersey's state legislature has defied the state's gangsta rap again, with a recent first-in-the-nation vote requiring all new handguns sold to carry technology that allows only their owners to fire them.

(Earlier, the state took another gun-control lead as the first to require guns be sold with trigger locks.)

Even though such "smart gun" technology is not yet fully developed, New Jersey takes an appropriate gun- safety step by putting such a requirement in place.

Smart guns use sensors in a gun's grip wired to a microchip inside the gun. The chip "remembers" an individual owner's hand grip, and thus prevents the gun from firing if anyone else attempts to use it. Once the technology is determined to be safe and workable (in an expected two years), the New Jersey law requires the technology to be phased in over three years.

The safety ramifications for this move are significant. Smart guns can help prevent accidental deaths or suicides. Gun accidents, including suicides, took the lives of 1,200 children and teens in 2000 in the US. Further, some 18,000 young people aged 19 or younger were injured by firearms, and 1,776 were killed in homicides according to the Centers for Disease Control.

Now that Congress has approved pilots carrying guns on commercial airplanes as a security measure, issuing smart guns to them could help prevent those weapons from being grabbed and used by anyone else.

Smart guns would also be rendered useless if stolen.

Even though the weapon was a rifle, not a handgun, in the recent Washington sniper case, the gun couldn't have been used by the two individuals involved, had it been "smart."

Though New Jersey is first to make the move, Tennessee, New York, and Ohio are already considering similar smart-gun measures. They'll have to stand up to the NRA, which has said it will retaliate against New Jersey Democrats for passing the bill, and no doubt will be at the ready to put pressure on other statehouses to keep them from passing similar legislation.


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: banglist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
Seems I recall this has already been tried, and failed. Back in the '70's someone came up with an add-on for S&W revolvers that required the shooter wear a magnetized ring in order to fire the weapon. That bombed, too.

But, my beloved Tennessee is contemplating a similar bill?

We've let too many left-coasters move in!!!

1 posted on 01/07/2003 11:20:22 AM PST by hoosierskypilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: hoosierskypilot
"We must have..... safer guns..... and safer bullets!" -- "Dr." Jocelyn Elders, former Surgeon General of the United States of America.
2 posted on 01/07/2003 11:23:21 AM PST by Cincinatus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosierskypilot
The chip "remembers" an individual owner's hand grip, and thus prevents the gun from firing if anyone else attempts to use it.

I think we need a smart chip for computers. It will check to see if journalists HAVE a grip before allowing them to write opinion columns.

3 posted on 01/07/2003 11:24:06 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosierskypilot
Smart guns would also be rendered useless if stolen.

How naive can you get.

4 posted on 01/07/2003 11:25:08 AM PST by traditionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosierskypilot
Why didn't they mention that cops would be exempt from having to buy "smart guns"?

BTW, that was Rep. Henri "I hate America and will not say the Pledge of Allegiance" Brooks who introduced the "smart gun" bill here. It got about two minutes worth consideration.
5 posted on 01/07/2003 11:25:20 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *bang_list
Good stuff for the BANG List
6 posted on 01/07/2003 11:27:21 AM PST by xsrdx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosierskypilot
Even though the weapon was a rifle, not a handgun, in the recent Washington sniper case, the gun couldn't have been used by the two individuals involved, had it been "smart."

I love that. What an empty, brainless statement.

Also, the police should be first to get issued these "safer" weapons.

7 posted on 01/07/2003 11:27:48 AM PST by HogFixer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosierskypilot
"Smart guns" are the dumbest idea. They get the user killed.
8 posted on 01/07/2003 11:28:00 AM PST by PatrioticAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosierskypilot
'Smart Guns' are Safer Guns

Not if the microchip gets fried; then it's just a piece of metal with a hand grip--and then how safe will one be using it in hand to hand combat?
9 posted on 01/07/2003 11:28:07 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosierskypilot
Even though the weapon was a rifle, not a handgun, in the recent Washington sniper case, the gun couldn't have been used by the two individuals involved, had it been "smart."

The rocket scientists at the CSM need to 'splain that a teensy bit further.

Too many assumptions required for that to be an accurate statement.

10 posted on 01/07/2003 11:30:57 AM PST by xsrdx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
Glad to hear it. Now, will you please remove that Berkeley, CA, indocrinated communist (Farley?) from Vanderbilt?

(There goes the neighborhood!)

11 posted on 01/07/2003 11:32:19 AM PST by hoosierskypilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HogFixer
Also, the police should be first to get issued these "safer" weapons.

Given that police are far more likely to be killed with their own gun than some other gun if anyone is forced to have this stupid technology then police should be the first to prove it out.

Stay well - stay safe - stay armed - Yorktown

12 posted on 01/07/2003 11:32:58 AM PST by harpseal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: hoosierskypilot
Smart guns use sensors in a gun's grip wired to a microchip inside the gun. The chip "remembers" an individual owner's hand grip, and thus prevents the gun from firing if anyone else attempts to use it.

Not only does no technology resembling this description exist, none of which I am aware is even being contemplated. "Remembers an individual owner's hand grip?" Huh? How?

Now, for those of us who like to practice weak-hand shooting or for a cop who experiences an injury to his shooting hand, this would be a bit of a problem, wouldn't it?

13 posted on 01/07/2003 11:39:14 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosierskypilot
'Smart Guns' are Safer Guns

<insanity>
"Liberal Logic" once again
Smart Guns
</insanity>
'Nuff Said!

14 posted on 01/07/2003 11:40:04 AM PST by Fiddlstix (Hooray! The tag line is Back! (Way To Go, John!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpseal
Even better, the politicians advocating this should show us what great leaders they are, and have their protective details be first to use this wonderful technology.

Once, on a C-SPAN call-in I challenged then MD Governor Glendening to do this. He smiled and changed the subject. I know what he was thinking: "yeah, fat chance. I am far more important than you peons. Shut up and pay your taxes."
15 posted on 01/07/2003 11:45:47 AM PST by alpowolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: hoosierskypilot
Obviously the folks at the CSM know nothing about firearms - which in itself is no great surprise. I their present form as strictly mechanical devices handguns specifically can be fussy and malfunction just when you need them to work perfectly. Now let's add some sort of electronics to this assembly of metal and see what failures we get due to intense recoil, vibration, cleaning materials, oil, and battery breakdown.

Are we surprised that law enforcement agencies want nothing to to with systems that WILL break down exactly as Murphy's Law predicts?

The only small-arms electrically-based system I know anything about is the new electric ignition Remington rifle. Reads like a good cartridge ignition system, but not because it's "smart."

16 posted on 01/07/2003 11:47:04 AM PST by toddst
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosierskypilot
Gun accidents, including suicides,

What incredible nonsense. This proves yet again that these people are up to no good. I know perfectly well that they're not so stupid as to not realise that a person who commits suicide with a gun most likely owns it. They are hoping that most of the sheeple are stupid enough to buy it.

17 posted on 01/07/2003 11:49:40 AM PST by alpowolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosierskypilot
and what happens when I have some dirt on my hand/fingers?

What happens if the batteries go dead?

How much will this increase the cost of guns?

How will hunters be able to hunt in cold weather? (gloves anyone?)
18 posted on 01/07/2003 11:51:00 AM PST by anobjectivist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
'Smart Guns' are Safer Guns

Not if the microchip gets fried; then it's just a piece of metal with a hand grip--and then how safe will one be using it in hand to hand combat?

How hard will it be to rig up a photo-capacitor to some coils and create a mini EMP generator. Then you could neutralize the smart guns and have your way with old fashion 'dumb' guns.

Oh wait, I forgot, the cops will probably be exempt from this technology.

19 posted on 01/07/2003 11:56:29 AM PST by TC Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: anobjectivist
How will hunters be able to hunt in cold weather? (gloves anyone?)

Hunters? How's about self-defense in cold weather? Excuse me, (Mr.|Mrs.|Ms.|Other) (rapist|murderer|robber|other) while I take off my gloves...

20 posted on 01/07/2003 11:56:36 AM PST by ArrogantBustard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson