To: headsonpikes
Isn't that science more compelling than arguable dating of disturbed strata?For the present, you are quite correct. However, if age-dating these finds reveals that the specimens were emplaced contemporaneously with surrounding sediments, then we will have to re-think our current theories.
18 posted on
01/02/2003 12:11:27 PM PST by
Aracelis
To: Piltdown_Woman
>>However, if age-dating these finds reveals that the specimens were emplaced contemporaneously with surrounding sediments, then we will have to re-think our current theories.<<
It seems to me that all that would need to be re-thought is the assumptions about the timing of genetic variations in mitochondrial DNA.
Older human skeletons push the timeline further backwards but don't, in and of themselves, change the well-established pattern of genetic variation of mitochondrial DNA, which clearly supports a single origin traceable back to Africa.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson